Lawyer: Airplane Type Involved In Texas Accident Has A History Of Engine Issues | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Sep 16, 2014

Lawyer: Airplane Type Involved In Texas Accident Has A History Of Engine Issues

Day Care Company CEO Fatally Injured In Accident Last Week

The type of airplane involved in an accident last Wednesday that fatally injured the CEO of a chain of day care centers in Texas has a history of engine issues, according to a lawyer who is also a licensed pilot.

The accident, which occurred September 10th, fatally injured 55-year-old David Anderson of Dallas, who along with his wife were co-owners and operators of the Play and Go Depot day care centers in northern Texas. Anderson had been a licensed pilot since 1975. The airplane, a Piper Aerostar, was registered to Anderson.

The Dallas Business Journal reports that the plane went down near Austin-Bergstrom airport at 1:26 p.m. local time. Anderson had departed from Dallas at 12:30 pm, according to the FAA, and did not report any issues with the airplane prior to the accident.

Attorney Mike Slack said in an interview with the paper that the Piper Aerostar has a "long history of engine failure" during the takeoff and landing phases of flight, and that "any kind of disruption in the normal sequence of events in the landing or the takeoff of the Aerostar is prone to cause problems and usually a crash."

Of course, the NTSB as yet hasn't even released a preliminary report from the accident.

Slack told the paper that the Aerostar "is a great airplane when both engines are operating at altitude," but it can be "unforgiving" if there is any kind of "anomaly."

Slack said that it was unlikely that Piper would be sued in connection with the accident because the airplane was manufactured in 1975, and a federal law makes suits against manufacturers involving airplanes more than 18 years old "difficult." He also said that the Aerostar was manufactured by Piper before they went through a bankruptcy, and the terms of the reorganization of the company included a discharge of liability for the Aerostar.

(Image from file. Not accident airplane)

FMI: www.slackdavis.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.25.24): Airport Rotating Beacon

Airport Rotating Beacon A visual NAVAID operated at many airports. At civil airports, alternating white and green flashes indicate the location of the airport. At military airports>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.25.24)

Aero Linx: Fly for the Culture Fly For the Culture, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that serves young people interested in pursuing professions in the aviation industry>[...]

Klyde Morris (04.22.24)

Klyde Is Having Some Issues Comprehending The Fed's Priorities FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC