FAA Proposes A Significant Rewrite Of Part 145 | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Tue, Oct 09, 2012

FAA Proposes A Significant Rewrite Of Part 145

AEA Tells Members The Proposal Is 'Potentially Damaging' To Their Businesses

The FAA has published an NPRM in the Federal Register that would amend the regulations for repair stations by revising the system of ratings, the repair station certification requirements, and the regulations on repair stations providing maintenance for air carriers. The FAA says this action is necessary because many portions of the existing repair station regulations do not reflect current repair station aircraft maintenance and business practices, or advances in aircraft technology. The FAA says these changes would modernize the regulations to keep pace with current industry standards and practices.

But the Aircraft Electronics Association takes a different view, saying the proposal makes wholesale changes to the avionics industry with damaging and costly repercussions. In its analysis, the AEA says the FAA "proposes to remove radio and instrument ratings and allow airframe-rated repair stations to work on radio and instrument components without qualifications or ratings. This proposal does not recognize avionics as a profession! Contrary to the FAA’s claim (in their summary above), this proposal does not reflect current repair station aircraft maintenance and business practices, or advances in aircraft technology. These changes would not modernize the regulations to keep pace with current industry standards and practices."

AEA further says that the cost to comply and transition to this new rule will impose a huge monetary investment on repair stations. This proposed rule requires revision and approval of all three repair station manuals, as well as developing and managing a list of capabilities. The FAA is not accounting for the man hours needed for a repair station to revise its manuals and create capability lists.

The rule proposes a 24-month implementation period to reissue new certificates for all repair stations. With the current lack of FAA workforce and sequestration initiatives, how will the agency provide the resources needed to approve and reissue certifications to 4,000 repair stations in a 24-month period? If a repair station certificate is not reissued within the 24-month time period, the previous certificate is no longer valid and businesses will not be able to operate as a Part 145 repair station.

AEA says that under this proposal, the system of ratings would be reduced from eight ratings to five ratings. The ratings definitions would be revised to indicate the type of work that a repair station is authorized to perform. But, it also removes radio and instrument ratings and allows airframe-rated repair stations to repair and alter radios and instruments without any specific ratings or obvious qualifications. The association holds that the proposal does not specifically require a capability list, but does require a listing of capabilities for all repair stations. This is a potentially marked change for repair stations with class ratings that do not currently have a capability list of the items they maintain. Also, capabilities list, or list of capabilities, will be subject to a line-item review every 24 months. This requirement will force repair stations to hire additional staff to maintain these lists.

In addition, AEA says, each certificated repair station must provide and maintain suitable permanent housing for the facilities, equipment, materials and personnel consistent with its ratings. It appears this provision would prohibit mobile operations. Currently, the regulations allow for a permanent "fixed location" but not permanent housing. In addition, the proposal would not allow “space available” contracts with landlords.

Comments on the NPRM are due no later than November 19, 2012. The document number is faa–2006–26408-0211

FMI: www.regulations.gov, www.aea.net

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.02.24)

Aero Linx: Model Aeronautical Association of Australia MAAA clubs are about fun flying, camaraderie and community. For over 75 years, the MAAA has been Australia’s largest fl>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.02.24): Touchdown Zone Lighting

Touchdown Zone Lighting Two rows of transverse light bars located symmetrically about the runway centerline normally at 100 foot intervals. The basic system extends 3,000 feet alon>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.02.24)

“Discovery and innovation are central to our mission at Virgin Galactic. We’re excited to build on our successful record of facilitating scientific experiments in subor>[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus Design Corp SR20

Student Pilot Reported That During Rotation, “All Of A Sudden The Back Of The Plane Kicked To The Right..." Analysis: The student pilot reported that during rotation, “>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC