AOPA: Part 77 Obstruction Rules Could Negatively Impact GA Airports | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.13.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Mon, Sep 25, 2006

AOPA: Part 77 Obstruction Rules Could Negatively Impact GA Airports

Recommends Different Guidelines For Smaller Fields

A series of proposed updates to the FAA's airspace protection regulations, as defined under Part 77 of the Federal Aviation Regulations, has mostly met with approval from the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association... but that's not to say AOPA doesn't have some additional suggestions to protect smaller general aviation airports.

"AOPA generally supports the changes the FAA has proposed, but there are some things that might have a negative affect on GA airports," said Heidi Williams, AOPA director of air traffic services. "We're asking for additional analysis before the rule changes become final."

Of most concern, according to AOPA, is a proposal to expand the "imaginary primary surface" at many GA airports with nonprecision instrument approaches. The problem with that plan -- which, essentially, limits obstructions in a protected area surrounding the runway -- is that it would decrease the amount of land available for taxiways, aprons, and hangars.

AOPA also says the obstruction limits could also prevent smaller airports from making any such improvements -- because they wouldn't have enough space under the proposed rules. Existing structures could also be affected -- because facilities that were once an acceptable distances away from the runway, might now be labeled "obstructions" under the new rules.

AOPA called for the FAA to conduct additional analysis before implementing the rule changes.

"Simply put, smaller GA airports cannot comply financially with the same standards applicable at larger hub airports," said the pilot advocacy group.

AOPA also recommends the FAA reduce its obstruction standard from 499 feet to 400 feet above the surface. AOPA says would allow for safer operations for airspace users flying at the 500-foot minimum safe altitude in uncongested areas.

Other proposals made for Part 77 met with AOPA's approval -- such as a measure codifying the electromagnetic interference obstruction standards to better protect aviation communication and navigation radio transmissions.

The proposal to add obstruction protection for private-use airports with approved instrument approach procedures also met with AOPA's approval, along with increasing the advance warning period for construction of or alteration to an obstructing structure from 30 to 60 days.

FMI: www.aopa.org, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.10.24): Takeoff Roll

Takeoff Roll The process whereby an aircraft is aligned with the runway centerline and the aircraft is moving with the intent to take off. For helicopters, this pertains to the act>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.10.24)

“We’re proud of the hard work that went into receiving this validation, and it will be a welcome relief to our customers in the European Union. We couldn’t be mor>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.11.24)

"Aircraft Spruce is pleased to announce the acquisition of the parts distribution operations of Wag-Aero. Wag-Aero was founded in the 1960’s by Dick and Bobbie Wagner in the >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.11.24): IDENT Feature

IDENT Feature The special feature in the Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System (ATCRBS) equipment. It is used to immediately distinguish one displayed beacon target from other be>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.11.24)

Aero Linx: Pararescue Air Force Pararescuemen, also known as PJs, are the only DoD elite combat forces specifically organized, trained, equipped, and postured to conduct full spect>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC