Feel Like A Guinea Pig? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.13.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Fri, Apr 09, 2004

Feel Like A Guinea Pig?

NATCA Protests Testing Of STARS Fix On Real Traffic

The Standard Terminal Automation Replacement System is designed to revert to a backup system when problems arise, such as incorrect identification of planes, which is now plaguing STARS in the Detroit Terminal Radar Approach Control room. But the National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA) says it's "bad policy, not bad technology," that the FAA is testing possible fixes not in a simulator but with live traffic on the STARS system itself, which remains plugged in while Detroit's backup system sits ready and free, but unused.

NATCA says the FAA's stance is inexplicable and unnecessarily risky, one that's putting controllers and the flying public in jeopardy. NATCA likened it to performing critical maintenance on a car with the hood up while traveling at 60 miles per hour.

"This is an unacceptable way of doing business," NATCA Director of Safety and Technology Doug Fralick said. "Why did the FAA spend millions of taxpayer dollars to develop a system that has the capability to fall back to ARTS in the event things don't go as planned and then steadfastly refuse to use it? The FAA is experimenting in Detroit with untested adaptations, putting the system on Emergency Service Level to install the adaptations, then waiting to see what happens with live traffic. It's unbelievable. Detroit has a fully functional Electronic Target Generator lab, which would allow the FAA to see if its proposed fixes will work. Why not use it?"

NATCA says much of the problems with STARS in Detroit involve the incorrect tracking of aircraft. Aircraft departing off the end of the runway are often not receiving correct data tags indicating their flight information, such as speed, altitude and heading. Some departures are not showing up at all on controllers' radar scopes, while other departures are receiving data tags that belong to aircraft on arrival to the airport. In addition, at times, the data tag flies off in a direction not associated with the actual radar location of the flight, and there have even been reports of STARS not tracking some aircraft at all until several miles from the airport.

"The major issue is that the primary aircraft target (on the radar scopes) is not tracking properly," stated Tom Kuhn, president of the Detroit TRACON local NATCA chapter. "Sometimes, the target is very tiny and hard to see. If it's not caught right away and the tower sends another departure on the parallel runway side-by-side, then you've got a potential problem if the planes turn. The result could be a loss of separation."

Kuhn said efforts to fix the glitches are ongoing but leading to other problems. This is highly risky because the system is still being used to control live traffic. "The system needs to be turned off while they correct the problems," he remarked. "Then they can evaluate the fixes on their simulation equipment. To be testing these fixes with live traffic raises safety concerns for me."

Fralick insisted NATCA's confidence level in STARS remains very high. "We're not asking the FAA to scrap STARS, simply fix it. What will it take to revert to the backup system? A near-miss? Or worse? It appears the FAA is more interested in saving face on STARS than doing what is safe and prudent."

FMI: www.faa.gov, www.natca.org

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 05.10.24: Icon Auction, Drunk MedEvac Pilot, Bell ALFA

Also: SkyReach Parts Support, Piper Service Ctr, Airliner Near-Miss, Airshow London The Judge overseeing Icon's convoluted Chapter 11 process has approved $9 million in Chapter 11 >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.13.24): ILS PRM Approach

ILS PRM Approach An instrument landing system (ILS) approach conducted to parallel runways whose extended centerlines are separated by less than 4,300 feet and at least 3,000 feet >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.13.24)

Aero Linx: FlyPups FlyPups transports dogs from desperate situations to fosters, no-kill shelters, and fur-ever homes. We deliver trained dogs to veterans for service and companion>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

Airborne 05.08.24: Denali Update, Dad-Daughter Gyro, Lake SAIB

Also: NBAA on FAA Reauth, DJI AG Drones, HI Insurance Bill Defeated, SPSA Airtankers The Beechcraft Denali continues moving forward towards certification, having received its FAA T>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC