Is this The Ultimate Zenith 701? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.10.24

Airborne-NextGen-06.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.12.24 Airborne-FltTraining-06.13.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.07.24

Mon, Jul 30, 2012

Is this The Ultimate Zenith 701?

Inexpensive Turbine Power

By David Juwel

Scott Ehni and Kary McCord brought a Zenith 701 to AirVenture, which wouldn't ordinarily be news, except their 701 uses a turbine for go-power. The first question I asked Scott was, “Why put an engine in an airplane that surely costs a great deal more than the airplane?” He stated that, “We actually built the turbine for less money than a high-end Rotax engine.”  Wow! That got my attention.

The turbine is a Garrett Jet Starter from an A-7 Corsair which required a little modification. They paid $20,000 for it. The engine is rated to 30,000 feet, although they've never had the aircraft over 10,000 feet. The biggest advantage of the turbine is that they have no issues with density altitude, they can burn any kind of fuel, they build turbo time for only $50.00 an hour, and if they actually needed to, they could fly at VNE all day long without issue. In spite of the turbine, the aircraft is flown within the flight specifications of the manufacturer. Keeping the engine performance married to the limits of the aircraft design specifications has the side benefit of less fuel flow. They also have to be careful of the type fuel they use because different fuels leave different deposits and residues. For instance, you wouldn't want to use leaded fuel. The plane carries 42 gallons.

Back in Texas, these guys have a complete CNC workshop with a punch, brake, shears, and mills. This allowed them to do much more with the aircraft and engine than a typical garage-builder could do. So they did. The aircraft is fully upholstered, has a 2-axis autopilot, and electric trim. A series of small modifications were also made to reduce weight. These changes allow them to fly with full fuel.

I suspect when they wind that turbine up on a flight line at a strange airport, that people really get confused because they can’t find the corporate turboprop that the noise is coming from.

Besides being the topic of conversation and photography wherever they go, I asked Scott if there have been any other benefits. He stated that because they built something so unique, it has brought in an additional $750,000 in their business. It’s given them the reputation that they can do anything, so everything is brought to them.

FMI: ehpro@live.com


Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.10.24): Known Traffic

Known Traffic With respect to ATC clearances, means aircraft whose altitude, position, and intentions are known to ATC.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.10.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Suppliers Association (ASA) Established February 25, 1993, the Aviation Suppliers Association (ASA), based in Washington, D.C., is a not-for-profit association,>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.11.24): Abeam

Abeam An aircraft is “abeam” a fix, point, or object when that fix, point, or object is approximately 90 degrees to the right or left of the aircraft track. Abeam indic>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.11.24)

Aero Linx: The Air Charter Safety Alliance The group, called the Air Charter Safety Alliance, will raise awareness of illegal charter flights among potential customers, charter bro>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.11.24)

“For months, ALPA has been sounding the alarm on the ongoing efforts by some aircraft manufacturers to remove pilots from the flight deck and replace them with automation. To>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC