Fourteen 9/11 Families Settle With UAL, Security Firm | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.28.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-05.29.24 Airborne-Unlimited-05.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.24.24

Wed, Sep 19, 2007

Fourteen 9/11 Families Settle With UAL, Security Firm

Law Firm Has Another 21 Cases Pending

Fourteen families who lost loved ones in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks reached settlements in federal court Monday, in their cases against a private security company and United Airlines.

Terms of the settlements were not disclosed, reports CNN. The families chose not to participate in the victims compensation fund created by Congress two weeks after the attacks, as they felt the fund was "unfair in numerous ways," said Motley Rice LLC attorney Donald Migliori.

The South Carolina-based law firm -- no strangers to aviation-related litigation -- represents the majority of families seeking compensation over the attacks. After the settlements, Motley Rice has 21 remaining 9/11-related cases still pending.

The settlements reached Monday mostly involved passengers on United Airlines Flights 93 and 175.

Flight 175 was one of two planes that struck the World Trade Center towers; Flight 93 crashed in a field in Shanksville, PA after passengers onboard attempted to retake the aircraft from hijackers.

Another defendant in several of the cases is Argenbright Security, which once handled security screening operations for the Department of Transportation. The DOT dropped the firm in 2002, following allegations of inferior safety practices.

Some of the families may still chose to reject the settlement, according to Marc Moller of Kreindler & Kreindler. Moller coordinates communication among the various law firms involved in the cases, according to CNN.

FMI: www.united.com, www.motleyrice.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.29.24)

Aero Linx: International Association of Professional Gyroplane Training (IAPGT) We are an Association of people who fly, build or regulate Gyroplanes, who have a dream of a single >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.29.24): NORDO (No Radio)

NORDO (No Radio) Aircraft that cannot or do not communicate by radio when radio communication is required are referred to as “NORDO.”>[...]

Airborne 05.28.24: Jump Plane Down, Starship's 4th, Vision Jet Problems

Also: uAvionix AV-Link, F-16 Viper Demo, TN National Guard, 'Staff the Towers' A Saturday afternoon jump run, originating from SkyDive Kansas City, went bad when it was reported th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.30.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC