Sat, Jun 05, 2010
Hefty Fees And Annual Renewals Would Come With The
Legislation
The California Legislature
reauthorized a state Post-Secondary Bureau last year that monitors
the quality of post-secondary institutions and protects students
from losing pre-paid tuition to a school that closes down. Flight
training facilities had been exempted, but as part of the
re-authorization of the Bureau (Assembly Bill 48; AB48), the
exemption was tentatively removed.
With the exemption lifted, all flight training facilities, from
full-fledged Part 141 flight schools to independent instructors,
must be certified and operate as though they are a post-secondary
institution such as a college or technical school. The National Air
Transportation Association (NATA) contends that AB48 was designed
to regulate private colleges and technical schools, not the
disparate world of flight instruction which varies widely and whose
curriculum is already regulated by the FAA.
The NATA says that the rules would affect independent and small
flight schools as the cost and infrastructure requirements are
quite involved. It would likely force instructors to either leave
the profession or try to join a large flight school to avoid the
start-up and maintenance costs, and administrative hassles. Small
FBOs that offer instruction would also face a hard decision about
whether to continue to offer instruction.
If an independent instructor were to want to continue
instructing under the new rules they would be subject to additional
qualifications for flight instructors before they could teach in
California even though they are certified by the FAA. In addition,
all instructors would be subject to academic reviews that are
designed for colleges and universities.
Along with the annual academic reviews, periodic fees would be
assessed on each flight instructor including $2.50 per $1000 which
would go toward a state fund that would pay claims to students
whose CFI "disappears" with their money. Each instructor would be
charged an initial application fee of $5,000 and a $3,500 renewal
fee every three years. If the instructor has a second location an
additional fee of $1,000 would be assessed. Finally, they would be
required to pay an operation fee of three-quarters of a percent of
the CFI's income (not to exceed $2,5000 annually).
Public comment on this change closes June 7.
More News
How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]
Aero Linx: International Association of Professional Gyroplane Training (IAPGT) We are an Association of people who fly, build or regulate Gyroplanes, who have a dream of a single >[...]
NORDO (No Radio) Aircraft that cannot or do not communicate by radio when radio communication is required are referred to as “NORDO.”>[...]
Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]
Aero Linx: Malibu M-Class Owners and Pilots Association (MMOPA) The Piper M-Class Owners & Pilots Association (PMOPA) is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to the interest>[...]