Judge Drops Jeppesen From Comair 5191 Suit | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.23.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.24.24 Airborne-FltTraining-04.25.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.26.24

Wed, Jul 02, 2008

Judge Drops Jeppesen From Comair 5191 Suit

Mapmaker Cleared Of Liability In Takeoff Crash

The lawsuits that resulted from the crash of Comair Flight 5191 are gradually being resolved. Of the 47 suits filed on behalf of deceased passengers, 16 have been settled to date. Now, a suit which blamed Boeing subsidiary Jeppesen Sanderson for providing charts lacking detail on airport construction has been set aside by a federal judge.

As ANN reported, Flight 5191 was the CRJ-100 regional jet which took off from the wrong runway at Lexington Blue Grass Airport on August 27, 2006. The plane ran out of runway before it was ready to rotate for takeoff. Of the 50 passengers and crew onboard, the only survivor was co-pilot James Polehinke.

According to The Associated Press, lawyers for Polehinke and his fellow crew members blamed Jeppesen in part for the accident, saying the chart in the cockpit that morning didn't show a taxiway barrier that directed planes along an alternate route to the main runway. Polehinke asserted that was one reason the CRJ lined up on runway 26, instead of runway 22 as directed.

The chart was overdue for an update from Jeppesen... but that point was rendered moot when Judge Karl Forester determined that at the time the update was scheduled, the barrier would not have been in place anyway. Also factoring into the decision was Polehinke's own testimony, that he couldn't recall the Jeppesen charts being used by either pilot that morning, and that as a rule, he only referred to the charts when he thought he needed help navigating an airport.

Forester also pointed out the FAA had issued the appropriate notices to airmen warning of the changes.

The summary judgment by Forrester effectively ends Jeppesen's involvement in the case brought on behalf of Polehinke and his deceased crewmates. The case now goes to court, and that's scheduled for August 4.

Robert Clifford, a lawyer representing some of the victims' families, said the decision was no surprise. "Our focus and beliefs remain... that this tragedy occurred when two pilots operated a plane on the wrong runway and should have known better, on their own without any involvement from any outside source."

FMI: www.jeppesen.com, www.comair.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.28.24): Airport Marking Aids

Airport Marking Aids Markings used on runway and taxiway surfaces to identify a specific runway, a runway threshold, a centerline, a hold line, etc. A runway should be marked in ac>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.28.24)

"It is extremely difficult, if not impossible, for manned aircraft to see a drone while conducting crop-enhancing and other aerial applications at low altitudes and high speeds. We>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.28.24)

Aero Linx: The Skyhawk Association The Skyhawk Association is a non-profit organization founded by former Skyhawk Pilots which is open to anyone with an affinity for the A-4 Skyhaw>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.29.24)

“The T-54A benefits from an active Beechcraft King Air assembly line in Wichita, Kansas, where all required METS avionics and interior modifications are installed on the line>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.29.24)

Aero Linx: Aerostar Owners Association The Association offers the Aerostar Owner a unique opportunity to tap an invaluable source of information concerning the care and feeding of >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC