Sandel Wins Summary Judgement Against Honeywell In TAWS Lawsuit | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.23.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.24.24 Airborne-FltTraining-04.25.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.26.24

Sat, Nov 01, 2003

Sandel Wins Summary Judgement Against Honeywell In TAWS Lawsuit

In a statement issued by Sandel Avionics, ANN has learned that a summary judgment issued by the US District Court in Delaware has ruled that Sandel does not infringe on any of Honeywell's Terrain Avoidance Warning System (TAWS) patents, ending more than 17 months of legal action by Honeywell.

Two weeks ago, the same court ruled that more than 20 of Honeywell's other claims relating to the display elements of the same patents were invalid.

Together, the rulings confirm that Sandel is not subject to liability for infringement and faces no risk of damages or injunction due to Honeywell's action. Commenting on the decision rendered by Judge Mary Pat Thynge, Sandel CEO Gerry Block said, "This is absolutely a huge win. My firm belief has always been that Sandel's independently developed technology was unique and innovative, and did not infringe any of Honeywell's patents. This ruling confirms that, and also ensures that aviation customers will have the choice of a better way to display terrain and safety data."

In a reversal of roles, Sandel is now taking Honeywell to trial on the issue of whether Honeywell's remaining patents are actually valid. In addition, Sandel expects to seek an award of attorney's fees from the U.S. District Court based on Honeywell's action, as well as on its misconduct in continuing to press claims that it knew to be without merit.

Honeywell Inc. and Honeywell Intellectual Properties Inc., Honeywell's patent holding company, had alleged that Sandel Avionics Inc. and several other companies infringed Honeywell's patents relating to its Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System (EGPWS), Honeywell's version of TAWS. Honeywell filed the case in May 2002, just days after Sandel announced the FAA certification of its ST3400 Terrain Awareness and Warning System (TAWS).

The FAA had earlier issued a mandate requiring most turbine aircraft to install an FAA certified TAWS by 2005. Honeywell, which had assisted the FAA in preparing the TAWS regulations, subsequently sued a number of other TAWS manufacturers, claiming it held five patents that effectively precluded competition in the TAWS market.

FMI: www.sandel.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.26.24): DETRESFA (Distress Phrase)

DETRESFA (Distress Phrase) The code word used to designate an emergency phase wherein there is reasonable certainty that an aircraft and its occupants are threatened by grave and i>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.26.24)

"General aviation is at the forefront of developing and introducing innovative technologies that will transform the entire aviation industry..." Source: Kyle Martin, Vice President>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.27.24): Direct

Direct Straight line flight between two navigational aids, fixes, points, or any combination thereof. When used by pilots in describing off-airway routes, points defining direct ro>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.27.24)

Aero Linx: Women in Corporate Aviation Women in Corporate Aviation support individuals seeking career advancement and professional development in the business aviation industry. Me>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.27.24)

“We would like to thank the many volunteers that help throughout the year to pull off the event, as well as the several reviewers, judges, and SURVICE staff that provide team>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC