Wed, Jul 18, 2018
Designed in 1955 With Looks That Are Timeless
By: Tom Woodward
In 1955 renowned aircraft designer Stelio Frati designed the Falco which was originally built in Italy by Aviamilano then Aeromere and later Laverda as a certified aircraft. In the 1980s the Falco was converted to kit form and sold in the US by the Sequoia Aircraft Company of Richmond, Virginia until 2014 when it closed its doors. Sequair, the Virginia company still maintains a website with much valuable information about this sleek and sexy looking aircraft. The FAA website lists about 61 Falcos under US registry but there are many others flying throughout the world both certified and kit built.
The Sequoia Falco is constructed of Spruce and typically Finnish birch plywood. The structure is built from laminated spruce bulkheads and the birch plywood is used for the skins. It’s powered by a Lycoming 160 to 180 HP engine and is widely considered to be one of the best handling, strongest and most aesthetically pleasing aircraft kits available today. The aircraft is rated for 6G positive and 3G negative.
Building a Falco is a labor of love and no special skills are required but a love of woodworking helps, because by the time you have a flying airplane you will have between 3000-5000 hours of labor involved. Nothing is difficult, but it is time consuming and though the fasted built Falco took only 13 months, most will take years and some decades but the patience to finish one will pay off in the most enjoyable flying experience.
Having before flown and now owning a Falco (Oshkosh winner in 2005) I can attest to the precise, smooth harmony of the controls, such that you only have to think where you want the airplane to go and it responds to your whim. On 160 hp the Falco will cruise at 160kts at 25 squared though others who have been finicky about drag reduction have seen over 200kts. With a 160hp Lycoming this can be done at about 8-9 gph making the Falco not only sexy and fast but also efficient. To me it is more comfortable than an RV 6 with a larger baggage area. The step up onto the wing is lower than an RV due to the length of the retractable gear. Gross weight is set by the builder but GW’s of up to 2250 lbs are possible. With 40 gallons of fuel you have a pretty good payload though you have to watch the CG because the wing carries no fuel as the tanks are forward and aft of the cockpit.
(Images provided by the author)
More News
Instrument Approach Procedure (IAP) Charts Portray the aeronautical data which is required to execute an instrument approach to an airport. These charts depict the procedures, incl>[...]
“Our industry is approaching a 30-year innovation cycle, and we have less than 25 years to decarbonize aviation. We need to develop new methods to get net zero aerospace tech>[...]
Also: Girls in Aviation Day, B-29 Doc Heads 4 Chino, C-17 Tail Cone Detaches, Bulgaria Airshow Accident One of two private aircraft that launched from Apatity Airport near Murmansk>[...]
From 2021 (YouTube Version): We Were Blown Away At How Well The Nosewheel Was Adapted To The X Cub Airframe It should not be a secret to any one of you, that with thousands of hour>[...]
Also: Volato Nixed by Honda, New B-21 Bases, A-10 Unit Inactivated, Gogo/Airshare Boom Supersonic announced its demonstrator aircraft XB-1 successfully completed its third test fli>[...]