Fri, Apr 23, 2010
Airlines Had Requested Relief At Congested New York Region
Airports
The U.S. DOT today denied the requests of five airlines for a
temporary exemption from the new rule limiting tarmac delays. As a
result, all U.S. carrier flights covered by the rule will be
subject to its terms effective April 29.
"Passengers on flights delayed on the tarmac have a right to
know they will not be held aboard a plane indefinitely," U.S.
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said. "This is an important
consumer protection, and we believe it should take effect as
planned."
The tarmac delay provision was part of a new airline passenger
protection rule, issued last December, that prohibits U.S. airlines
operating domestic flights from permitting an aircraft to remain on
the tarmac at large and medium hub airports for more than three
hours without deplaning passengers. Exceptions were allowed
only for safety or security reasons or if air traffic control
advises the pilot in command that returning to the terminal would
disrupt airport operations.
On March 4, JetBlue Airways asked for an exemption from the rule
for its operations at New York's JFK Airport until that airport's
main runway, currently under construction, reopens on Dec. 1. That
request was followed by similar requests by Delta Air Lines and
American Airlines for their operations at JFK, by Continental
Airlines for their flights at New York LaGuardia Airport and Newark
International Airport, and by US Airways for Philadelphia
International Airport. The carriers argued that, without the
requested exemption, large numbers of flights will have to be
canceled at the New York area airports and affected passengers will
face significant inconveniences and delays before being
accommodated.
Ray LaHood
In denying the requests, the Department concluded that airlines
could minimize tarmac delays by rerouting or rescheduling flights
at JFK to allow the airport's other three runways to absorb the
extra traffic. The Department also noted that it has the ability to
take into account the impact of the runway closure and the harm to
consumers when deciding whether to pursue enforcement action for
failure to comply with the rule and the amount of a fine, if any,
to seek as a result of non-compliance.
More News
Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]
Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]
Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]
From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]
Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]