FAA Wants To Fine Atlantic Coast, United | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Tue, Jun 08, 2004

FAA Wants To Fine Atlantic Coast, United

$2.5 Million In Civil Penalties For FAR Violations

The FAA wants to assess civil penalties totaling $2.5 million against Atlantic Coast Airlines and United Airlines for allegedly violating Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs). The FAA alleges both airlines failed to follow required maintenance actions on specific aircraft, and further operated those aircraft when they were not in compliance with regulations.

The FAA proposes to assess a civil penalty of $1.5 million against Atlantic Coast Airlines (now doing business as Independence Air) for operating several of its aircraft without performing mandatory inspections of engines, airframes and other components.

Atlantic Coast allegedly failed to: maintain its aircraft according to the airline’s FAA-approved continuous airworthiness maintenance program and the limits set out in its operations specifications; have a properly functioning inspection program for its aircraft; and keeping appropriate maintenance records on its aircraft. It also operated those aircraft when they were not in compliance with regulations.

The airline has taken immediate remedial steps to comply with maintenance, inspection and record-keeping requirements. The FAA says it will closely monitor the airline’s progress to ensure its operations comply fully with federal regulations

The FAA has also proposed a civil penalty of $1 million against United for operating a B-777 aircraft on about 263 flights when it allegedly was not in compliance with regulations.

The FAA alleges that the emergency escape slides were unusable on those flights, based on a ramp check of the aircraft by FAA inspectors at Denver International Airport in November 2001.  During this inspection, inspectors discovered a "Remove Before Flight" warning streamer visible in the window-view of an emergency escape slide. It was determined that a safety maintenance pin was installed in the escape slide, rendering it unusable in the event of an evacuation. Further investigation revealed that all eight doors on the B-777 had safety pins installed in the escape slide packs and would have been unusable in an emergency.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.24): Hold Procedure

Hold Procedure A predetermined maneuver which keeps aircraft within a specified airspace while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control. Also used during ground operatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.06.24): Altitude Readout

Altitude Readout An aircraft’s altitude, transmitted via the Mode C transponder feature, that is visually displayed in 100-foot increments on a radar scope having readout cap>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.06.24)

Aero Linx: European Hang Gliding and Paragliding Union (EHPU) The general aim of the EHPU is to promote and protect hang gliding and paragliding in Europe. In order to achieve this>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.07.24)

"The need for innovation at speed and scale is greater than ever. The X-62A VISTA is a crucial platform in our efforts to develop, test and integrate AI, as well as to establish AI>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC