California Court Upholds Local No-Banner Law | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.07.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.08.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.09.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Mon, Jan 14, 2002

California Court Upholds Local No-Banner Law

Honolulu Aerial Ad Ban Flies on Appeal

In October of 1998, US District Judge Helen Gillmor denied the right of SkySign International to challenge a Honolulu (HI) ordinance banning helicopter banner-towing. That denial was upheld last week, by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

In the 1998 ruling, Gillmor said the city had, "an overwhelming aesthetic interest" in the ban, because Hawaii's tourism industry depends so much on the "beauty of the islands."

SkySign, for its part, noted that the airspace wasn't regulated by cities. In the October 1997 suit, SkySign pointed out that the FAA, which, until that time, was in charge of such things, had properly permitted the business to tow banners in US airspace. The Honolulu City Council decided to overrule the FAA, and SkySign was left to defend its right to make a living. That right was denied, after a year, by Judge Helen; her ruling was affirmed by the appeals court.

The ruling was possible because the Court considered SkySign's emphasis to be "advertising," rather than "flying," a precedent that could open a huge can of worms, and will, we predict, eviscerate the FAA's authority over the airspace. The Court acknowledged that SkySign was somehow connected to flying, it ruled, "...however, advertising is an area traditionally subject to regulation under the states' police power, and we therefore presume that federal law does not displace Honolulu's regulatory authority over advertising absent a clear statement of the federal intent to do so." [By that reasoning, we suppose the cities could  authorize anyone's flying over a populated area, if the city were the one which was advertising. Since the pilot wouldn't be involved in "aviation," but rather in "advertising," why should the FAA have anything to say about it? --ed]

The City Council said it had been responding to citizens' complaints about the 8' x36' electric-lighted sign that SkySign typically displayed off Oahu's beaches.

FMI: http://www.co.honolulu.hi.us/mayor/goals.htm, www.faa.gov 

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 06.30.25: US v ADS-B Misuse, NatÂ’l STOL Fire, Volocopter Resumes

Also: Netherlands Donates 18 F16s, 2 737s Collide On Ramp, E-7 Wedgetail Cut, AgEagle's 100th In S Korea The Pilot and Aircraft Privacy Act was introduced in the House by Represent>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (07.06.25)

“This delivery represents more than just a milestone. It symbolizes our shared commitment to national security and our unwavering support for the men and women who serve on t>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.06.25)

Aero Linx: Vintage Wings of Canada Foundation Vintage Wings of Canada is a not-for-profit, charitable organization with a collection of historically significant aircraft and is run>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Portrait of the Army Aviation Heritage Foundation

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): To Preserve and Teach Incorporated as a non-profit domestic corporation in June 1997, the Army Aviation Heritage Foundation (AAHF) is a one-of-a-kind, >[...]

Airborne-NextGen 07.01.25: Volocopter Returns, B23 Energic, Iran Tech In UAVs?

Also: Air Taxis May Be Close, AgEagle Sells 100th, VAI Likes Bedford, AURA AERO Cleans Up Volocopter has resumed work towards the certification of its VoloCity eVTOL, this time und>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC