Opposition to Jetport West Gets Teeth | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.13.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.14.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.15.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.16.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.17.24

Sat, Jul 31, 2004

Opposition to Jetport West Gets Teeth

ATC Expert Backs Opponents To Texas Airport

The Jetport West Airport project proposed for the city of Fulshear (TX) "presents an irreconcilable conflict with several local airports, making it fundamentally unsafe and a hazard to navigable airspace."

So says an aviation consultant hired by the town, in an affidavit filed with the FAA Tuesday. Donald Hensley, a former controller and commercial pilot, believes building an airport when there are already six inside a five-mile radius will cause insurmountable problems throughout the area.

But Rick Asper, who speaks for Florida-based Aviation Professionals Group, says the airport his company wants to build won't cause any problems at all.

"It should be noted that there are literally hundreds of airports that are far closer to equivalent airstrips than these are, and that these airports and airstrips have coexisted for decades without incident," Asper said in an interview with the Katy (TX) Times.

Hensley, however, says there are already enough potential problems in that small area. Quoting FAA rules, he writes in the affidavit, "The traffic pattern airspace associated with an airport proposal may not overlap the traffic pattern of an adjacent airport."

But Asper says the FAA has already made an exception in that area. "Two of the airstrips to which they refer overlap each other, and in some people's definition of air traffic, have coexisted for 30 years without incident," Asper said.

The proximity of the proposed jetport to five other strips isn't Hensley's only concern. He says there are at least two obstructions just south of the 525-acre site pose a "hazard to air navigation."

Again, however, Asper says his company is addressing those obstructions -- and other concerns about the 7,000-foot jetport runway. "We are proposing a control tower. We will at our expense, fully man and operate a control tower. This is actually an increase in airspace safety."

FMI: www.aviation-professionals.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.16.24): Instrument Runway

Instrument Runway A runway equipped with electronic and visual navigation aids for which a precision or nonprecision approach procedure having straight-in landing minimums has been>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.16.24)

Aero Linx: Alaska Airmen's Association The Alaska Airmen's Association includes over 2,000 members—we are one of the largest General Aviation communities in the country. We s>[...]

Airborne 05.15.24: Ghost Sq MidAir, B-2 Junked, Dream Chaser Readies

Also: Flt School Security, G600 Steep-Approach, Honduran Aid, PW545D Cert Two aircraft performing at the Fort Lauderdale Air Show clipped wings during a routine last Sunday, spooki>[...]

Airborne 05.10.24: Icon Auction, Drunk MedEvac Pilot, Bell ALFA

Also: SkyReach Parts Support, Piper Service Ctr, Airliner Near-Miss, Airshow London The Judge overseeing Icon's convoluted Chapter 11 process has approved $9 million in Chapter 11 >[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 05.16.24: PRA Runway, Wag-Aero Sold, Young Eagles

Also: Paramotor Champ's, Electric Ultralight, ICON BK Update, Burt Rutan at Oshkosh! The Popular Rotorcraft Association is reaching out for help in rebuilding their private runway >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC