Aircraft Owners: Blame The Weather | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

Airborne On ANN

Airborne 03.02.15

Airborne 02.24.15

Airborne 02.25.15

Airborne 02.26.15

Airborne 02.27.15

Airborne Hi-Def On YouTube

Airborne 03.02.15

Airborne 02.24.15

Airborne 02.25.15

Airborne 02.26.15

Airborne 02.27.15

Thu, Feb 10, 2005

Aircraft Owners: Blame The Weather

Say Blizzard-Like Conditions Brought Down 737-200

The Afghan owners of a Boeing 737-200 that went down east of Kabul a week ago blame the weather. The accident killed all 104 passengers and crew, whose remains are at a mountain site more than 11,000 feet above sea level.

"The plane crashed in Kabul due to bad weather and not safety issues, said a manager at Phoenix Aviation, owner of Kam Air. "It was unfortunate, but it was not our fault." He was quoted by Reuters.

As a precaution, however, Kam Air has reportedly suspended its lease on another 737 in the wake of last Thursday's accident.

"It's more a precaution than anything else," said Charles Vincent. He's the UN's World Food Program representative in Kabul. "It's normal procedure after a plane crash to review the safety of the plane and the company that supplies it. It's for the clients' peace of mind," he told Reuters.

But is that true? Not according to that manager at Phoenix, who didn't want to be identified. He told the wire service that the UAE-based company had expected its contract with the UN and, in turn, with Kam Air, would be trashed because of "management problems."

The Kam Air 737-200 (file photo of type, right) was on its way from Herat to Kabul when it was turned away because of bad weather and the lack of a precision approach at the capital's airport. It fell off radar in high mountains about 20-miles east of Kabul. US officials who run the Bagram Air Base north of Kabul said they received no request from the 737's crew for permission to land there.

FMI: www.flykamair.com

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 03.02.15: HeliExpo, UAL Pilot Warning, WWII Flyover, RAF Aids In WV

Also: Blue Angels, Fuel Taxes, Twirly Birds, Bell 429WG, Delta Selects GoGo It’s common for airlines to issue numerous safety notice to flight crews, but United Airlines issu>[...]

EASA Certifies Continental MotorsÂ’ CD-155 Engine For DA42 TDI

Now Approved For European Installation, FAA Certification Pending EASA has certified Continental Motors Group CD-155 hp Jet-A diesel engine option for installation in the Diamond t>[...]

Counting Down! ANN's Infamous April 1st Edition's Just Around The Corner!

Get Your Wacky Ideas In NOW! ANN E-I-C Note: Folks... we gotta warn you... based on all the nonsense we've had to endure in 2014-2015 (which we are duty-bound to lampoon), this may>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (03.03.15)

How Planes Work Need a great illustration of an airplane, clearly labeled, so you can explain -- again -- why planes stay up in the air? This is a good illustration; maybe they'll >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (03.03.15): Have Numbers

Used by pilots to inform ATC that they have received runway, wind, and altimeter information only.>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2015 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC