Gov't Says Boeing Overcharged On B-1B Decoy System | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Wed, Sep 03, 2008

Gov't Says Boeing Overcharged On B-1B Decoy System

Sues Planemaker Under False Claims Act

The US government filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday against Boeing, saying the American planemaker and defense contractor deliberately inflated the price for a decoy system fitted to US Air Force B-1B Lancer bombers.

According to The Associated Press, the lawsuit claims the Air Force paid $7.5 million more than it should have, since Boeing was able to find a cheaper source for parts needed for the system... but failed to disclose that fact during contract negotiations, way back in 1990.

Specifically, the contract was based on Boeing's assertions it would manufacture parts for 57 decoy systems -- towed behind the bombers to thwart attacks from ground-based missiles and shoulder-fired rockets -- at a Boeing facility in Palmdale, CA. But the government says Boeing planned all along to close that plant, and obtain parts from a subcontractor at reduced cost.

Assistant US Attorney Lisa Palombo said had the USAF known of that change, it would have pushed for a lower price... and furthermore, that Boeing employees warned their managers to disclose the potential savings.

"It's a significant amount and, of course, it's all taxpayer money," she said. "We make it a priority to collect all taxpayer funds that are obtained through fraud. We don't make exceptions for anyone, individuals or large companies."

Company spokesman Forrest Gossett said Boeing believes it conducted its side of the negotiations in good faith, and that it fulfilled its contract.

The Air Force paid $36 million for the kits, according to the AP. Under the False Claims Act, the government may recover up to three times the amount it overpaid, on top of penalties.

FMI: www.af.mil, www.boeing.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.01.24): Say Altitude

Say Altitude Used by ATC to ascertain an aircraft's specific altitude/flight level. When the aircraft is climbing or descending, the pilot should state the indicated altitude round>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.01.24)

Aero Linx: European Air Law Association (EALA) EALA was established in 1988 with the aim to promote the study of European air law and to provide an open forum for those with an int>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Korean War Hero Twice Reborn

From 2023 (YouTube Version): The Life, Death, Life, Death, and Life of a Glorious Warbird In 1981, business-owner Jim Tobul and his father purchased a Chance-Vought F4U Corsair. Mo>[...]

Airborne 04.29.24: EAA B-25 Rides, Textron 2024, G700 Deliveries

Also: USCG Retires MH-65 Dolphins, Irish Aviation Authority, NATCA Warns FAA, Diamond DA42 AD This summer, history enthusiasts will have a unique opportunity to experience World Wa>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 05.02.24: Bobby Bailey, SPRG Report Cards, Skydive!

Also: WACO Kitchen Bails, French SportPlane Mfr to FL, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Innovation Preview Bobby Bailey, a bit of a fixture in sport aviation circles for his work with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC