Report: On-Demand Carrier Fatalities Loom Over Excellent Industry Safety Numbers | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.28.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-05.29.24 Airborne-Unlimited-05.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.24.24

Mon, Jul 10, 2006

Report: On-Demand Carrier Fatalities Loom Over Excellent Industry Safety Numbers

Charter Ops Average 2.2 Accidents Per 100,000 Flight Hours, Says Paper

The FAA, NTSB and other agencies are quick to point out to all who will listen that, by the numbers, this is the safest time ever to fly -- with the last major crash involving a domestic airliner occuring in November 2001, when an American Airlines jet went down in Queens, NY.

However, the picture isn't as rosy when you consider another segment of the aviation picture -- on demand operators. Or, more specifically, small cargo aircraft -- the kind that fly small packages and check stubs throughout the country -- as well as air taxis, charter operators and EMS helicopters.

The Miami Herald reports that, on average... one of these aircraft have been involved in a fatal accident every month, from 2000 to 2004.

The private air cargo auditing group Robert E. Breiling Associates told the paper that in 2004 alone, small cargo planes averaged 2.2 crashes for every 100,000 hours of US operation -- compared to rates of 0.11 for corporate jets, 0.13 for scheduled air carriers, 0.90 for business travel and 1.51 for scheduled commuters.

Furthermore, these accidents are up to 50 times more likely to result in fatalities, according to the NTSB.  

Alas, the only category with a higher crash rate is general aviation -- whose accident rate is nearly three times higher.

The Herald does not go into detail on ways to solve this problem... but it cannot be argued that better training would go a long way towards bringing that rate down. Many on demand operators also fly older planes... with older systems and avionics, as opposed to the newer technologies found in more advanced aircraft.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.29.24)

Aero Linx: International Association of Professional Gyroplane Training (IAPGT) We are an Association of people who fly, build or regulate Gyroplanes, who have a dream of a single >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.29.24): NORDO (No Radio)

NORDO (No Radio) Aircraft that cannot or do not communicate by radio when radio communication is required are referred to as “NORDO.”>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.30.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.30.24)

Aero Linx: Malibu M-Class Owners and Pilots Association (MMOPA) The Piper M-Class Owners & Pilots Association (PMOPA) is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to the interest>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.30.24)

“After eight months of negotiating, and a failed TA, unfortunately management has not recognized the pilots’ needs. We have expressed to management that we are willing >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC