TAM Demands Thrust Reversers Be Activated When Landing At Congonhas | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Thu, Aug 16, 2007

TAM Demands Thrust Reversers Be Activated When Landing At Congonhas

Speculation Focusing on Inoperative Reversers And Short, Slick Runway

In the wake of Brazil's deadliest air disaster last month, TAM Airlines has established a new policy that bans its aircraft from landing at the Congonhas Airport in Sao Paulo without the thrust reversers activated.

The airline said the new policy was introduced shortly after the crash that killed 199 people on July 17 and would remain in effect until "more detailed information" was uncovered in the investigation, according to the Associated Press.

Marco Aurelio Castro, TAM's head of security, informed a congressional panel investigating the accident of the policy change Tuesday.

As ANN reported, the Airbus A320's right thrust reverser was inoperable, and video from airport security cameras shows the aircraft on the runway at a much faster speed than necessary for landing... prompting some to speculate the pilots may have been trying to take off again.

Castro insisted the airline doesn't believe the cause of the accident was the inoperative thrust reverser and that was not the reason for the policy change but, rather, on government-approved safety measures.

The airline's policy also applies to landings at Rio de Janeiro's Santos Dumont airport due to the short runway there, Castro said.

TAM has also ordered software to warn pilots if throttles are on an incorrect setting during a landing.  There is speculation the July 17 accident was caused by the A320's throttles being set in the wrong position as well as on the short, slick runway, according to the AP.

Castro said such speculation is "imprudent."

Alex Frischman, who is responsible for the airline's A320 fleet, told the congressional panel human error could not be ruled out because "the pilots had very little time to make a decision after the plane touched down and the problem occurred."

FMI: www.tam.com.br, www.infraero.gov.br/usa

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.09.24)

"Fly-by-wire flight, coupled with additional capability that are being integrated into ALFA, provide a great foundation for Bell to expand on its autonomous capabilities. This airc>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.24): Hold Procedure

Hold Procedure A predetermined maneuver which keeps aircraft within a specified airspace while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control. Also used during ground operatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.09.24)

Aero Linx: B-21 Raider The B-21 Raider will be a dual-capable penetrating strike stealth bomber capable of delivering both conventional and nuclear munitions. The B-21 will form th>[...]

Airborne 05.03.24: Advanced Powerplant Solutions, PRA Runway Woes, Drone Racing

Also: Virgin Galactic, B-29 Doc to Allentown, Erickson Fire-Fighters Bought, FAA Reauthorization After dealing with a big letdown after the unexpected decision by Skyreach to disco>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC