Venice, Florida City Council Presses Case To Downgrade Airport | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

AMA Drone Report

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday

Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne-Unmanned w/AUVSI

Airborne On ANN

AMA 04.27.17

Airborne
04.24.17

Airborne
04.25.17

Airborne
04.26.17

Airborne
04.27.17

Airborne
04.28.17

Airborne-Unmanned 04.25.17

Airborne-YouTube

AMA 04.27.17

Airborne
04.24.17

Airborne
04.25.17

Airborne
04.26.17

Airborne
04.27.17

Airborne
04.28.17

Airborne-Unmanned 04.25.17

Tue, Feb 02, 2010

Venice, Florida City Council Presses Case To Downgrade Airport

FAA Recently Denied Such The Request

The Venice, Florida City Council has paid about $700,000 to a consulting firm in an effort to press its case to downgrade Venice Municipal Airport (KVNC). The FAA had sent a letter to the city council last month denying the request.

Council members have long pushed for a shorter runway in an attempt to remove about 24 homes and a golf course from the airport safety zone. They are also fighting a local FBO's attempt to build new hangar facilities at the airport, and have recently been more public about their desire to limit jet traffic at the facility, a move the FAA opposes.

The Sarasota Herald Tribune reports that the FAA has the authority to withhold state and federal money for planned runway improvements from the city, and require them to spend money from their local airport improvement fund for that purpose. The city used money from the fund to pay the consultants to file the plan opposed to the improvements. The paper reports that a majority of the council supports rejecting the FAA AIP grant.

A former FAA official told the paper that the city is obligated to follow FAA rules because it has accepted FAA funding in the past. It also may not discriminate against any particular type of aircraft.

A plan proposed by a consulting firm to shift runway 4-22 515 feet to the east, which would have had the effect of removing the golf course and homes from the safety zone, was rejected by the council despite the fact that the FAA would have likely picked up the $3 million price tag for the move. The runway is reportedly in a poor state of repair. But Vice Mayor Sue Lang said that was unacceptable because "We will proceed to have heavier and heavier jets."

FMI: www.faa.gov, www.venicegov.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.29.17)

Beechcraft Heritage Museum The Beechcraft Heritage Museum is a distinctly original one-of-a-kind, “living and working” aviation museum that traces the lineage of the Be>[...]

AMA Drone Report 04.27.17: Kitty Hawk Flyer, College Drones, DJI VR Goggles

Also: Airborne at XPONENTIAL, AMA On Mil-Airspace, Canadian Drones, AMA Legislative Efforts With an appearance not all that different than many of the multi-copters we’re all>[...]

Airborne-Unmanned 04.25.17: UAS Broadcast, College Drone Racing, XPO17 LIVE!

Also: Aeryon Labs, Northrop Grumman, XTAR Connectivity, Bowling Green Drones The broadcast platforms of tomorrow may well be unmanned... and 360 Designs has just introduced the Fly>[...]

Airborne 04.28.17: Perlan Mission II, DJI VR Goggles, Pilot... NOT!

Also: American Airlines, Airborne-NextGen, Biofuel, ATR 72-600, Gogo, Drone Drive, L3 Aviation Airbus Perlan Mission II, an initiative to fly a glider to the edge of space to colle>[...]

AUVSI and Aero-News Announce Live Webcast Schedules for XPONENTIAL 2017

The World's Greatest Gathering Of 'All Things Unmanned' Will Get Expert Live Coverage! The Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International (AUVSI) and their "Airborne-Unmann>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2017 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC