Georgia Couple Sues FAA Over October, 2014 Accident | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Sat, Sep 02, 2017

Georgia Couple Sues FAA Over October, 2014 Accident

Says Air Traffic Controllers 'Misdirected' Pilot To An Airport Beyond Airplane's Glide Distance

A Georgia couple has sued the FAA, saying an air traffic controller directed them to an airport that was outside the glide distance of the TBM 850 they were aboard when it lost engine power in October 2014.

The TBM was being flown by S. Blaine McCaleb III with his wife Cynthia aboard. The plane lost power, and McCaleb declared an in-flight emergency. According to the complaint filed Friday in the U.S. District Court's Northern District of Georgia, the controller gave McCaleb vectors to an airport that was about 10 nautical miles away, rather than an airport that was only 1.7 nautical miles from their location. The plane went down onto an athletic field. Both people on board survived the accident, but were both seriously injured, according to the complaint.

The suit names the Department of Transportation and the FAA as defendants, saying the controller "failed to follow training directives and failed to use reasonable care during communications with the pilot.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution reports that the airports are not named in the suit. But the Fayette County Sheriff's office said at the time that the plane had departed DeKalb-Peachtree Airport en route to Harris County Airport in Pine Mountain. The flight was diverted to Atlanta Regional Airport-Falcon Field in Peachtree City before it went down in an unoccupied athletic field at Starr's Mill High School in Fayetteville, GA.

The couple is seeking unspecified damages from the Government.

The NTSB's probable cause report, which is not admissible as evidence in court, said the probable cause of the accident was the pilot’s inadvertent deactivation of the yaw damper in flight, which resulted in a prolonged side-slip condition that led to fuel starvation and the eventual total loss of engine power. Contributing to the accident was the pilot’s failure to attempt to restart the engine.

(Image from file. Not accident Airplane)

FMI: Original Report, NTSB Probable Cause Report

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.05.24): Omnidirectional Approach Lighting System

Omnidirectional Approach Lighting System ODALS consists of seven omnidirectional flashing lights located in the approach area of a nonprecision runway. Five lights are located on t>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.05.24)

"Polaris Dawn, the first of the program’s three human spaceflight missions, is targeted to launch to orbit no earlier than summer 2024. During the five-day mission, the crew >[...]

Airborne 05.06.24: Gone West-Dick Rutan, ICON BK Update, SpaceX EVA Suit

Also: 1800th E-Jet, Uncle Sam Sues For Landing Gear, Embraer Ag Plane, Textron Parts A friend of the family reported that Lt. Col. (Ret.) Richard Glenn Rutan flew west on Friday, M>[...]

Airborne 05.03.24: Advanced Powerplant Solutions, PRA Runway Woes, Drone Racing

Also: Virgin Galactic, B-29 Doc to Allentown, Erickson Fire-Fighters Bought, FAA Reauthorization After dealing with a big letdown after the unexpected decision by Skyreach to disco>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.06xx.24)

“Our aircrews are trained and capable of rapidly shifting from operational missions to humanitarian roles. We planned to demonstrate how we, and our BORSTAR partners, respond>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC