Increasing UAV Popularity Raises The Question: Who Owns Your Airspace | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Mon, May 18, 2015

Increasing UAV Popularity Raises The Question: Who Owns Your Airspace

At Least 17 States Have Passed Laws Restricting UAV Flights

With more and more people buying UAVs, and more of them being equipped with some kind of camera, communities nationwide are racing to catch up with the technology in terms of laws and regulations for their use ... or to prevent that use.

At least 17 states have passed laws regulating the use of UAVs, and users say that many of them are unnecessarily heavy-handed, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal. Laws came as people flew UAVs, often costing under $100, over homes, populated areas, and crime scenes. And Richard Beary, president of the International Association of Chiefs of Police, says that many departments are not equipped to regulate airspace.

The FAA says it has jurisdiction over airspace all the way to the ground, and that its rules will take precedence over any state or local law or regulation. But while it has been somewhat effective in regulating commercial use of the UAVs, it is largely prohibited from regulating non-commercial uses by a law passed in 2012. Still, that has not stopped some states from passing very restrictive laws about the use of UAVs, and some towns have banned them altogether.

The FAA says that, as long as non-commercial UAVs don't endanger people, they can hover over private property legally. However, the FAA says that local "noise and nuisance" laws could be used to regulate flight in some areas.

Privacy is another issue, and some state laws have banned the capture of still images or video with UAVs on private property without the express consent of the property owner.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.25.24): Airport Rotating Beacon

Airport Rotating Beacon A visual NAVAID operated at many airports. At civil airports, alternating white and green flashes indicate the location of the airport. At military airports>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.25.24)

Aero Linx: Fly for the Culture Fly For the Culture, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that serves young people interested in pursuing professions in the aviation industry>[...]

Klyde Morris (04.22.24)

Klyde Is Having Some Issues Comprehending The Fed's Priorities FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC