Near-Miss For UK Charter Airline | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Sat, Dec 09, 2006

Near-Miss For UK Charter Airline

Aircraft Passes 56 Feet From Vehicle On Runway

A 737 operated by the UK's Excel Airways missed a vehicle on the runway it was using by only 56 feet according to an official report released Friday from the country's Air Accident Investigation Branch (AAIB).

The flight was departing Manchester bound for the Greek island of Kos with 190 passengers aboard in July 2003. The pilots were unaware the runway they were using was operating at a reduced length to allow for a team removing rubber deposits at the departure end.

The reports says the pilots couldn't see the opposite end of the runway because of a slight rise in the middle. It wasn't until the aircraft cleared the rise that the pilot saw the vehicles at the far end. By that time it was too late to abort the takeoff. The pilots believed they cleared the vehicles with a good margin.

The report found the crew were unaware of the reduced runway length available and irregularities with the way the airport and ATC handled disseminating information.

In fact, a day earlier, ATC directed three separate airliners to go around after clearing them to land on the same runway. When asked, none of the three crews were aware of the rubber-removal operation, or the reduced runway available. After telling the tower they couldn't accept a landing under the conditions, they were told to go around and assigned another runway.

AAIB says while the aircrew was clearly at fault, procedures for planning and managing future runway maintenance activities were altered to address concerns the agency expressed to both the operators of Manchester Airport and the National Air Traffic Service.

The primary cause of the near-disaster according to the AAIB was the flight crew did not realize the runway was operating at reduced length despite being in possession of a NOTAM concerning the work-in-progress, an ATIS broadcast relating to the work-in-progress and ATC passing information on the takeoff distance available.

FMI: www.aaib.dft.gov.uk

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.05.24): Omnidirectional Approach Lighting System

Omnidirectional Approach Lighting System ODALS consists of seven omnidirectional flashing lights located in the approach area of a nonprecision runway. Five lights are located on t>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.05.24)

"Polaris Dawn, the first of the program’s three human spaceflight missions, is targeted to launch to orbit no earlier than summer 2024. During the five-day mission, the crew >[...]

Airborne 05.06.24: Gone West-Dick Rutan, ICON BK Update, SpaceX EVA Suit

Also: 1800th E-Jet, Uncle Sam Sues For Landing Gear, Embraer Ag Plane, Textron Parts A friend of the family reported that Lt. Col. (Ret.) Richard Glenn Rutan flew west on Friday, M>[...]

Airborne 05.03.24: Advanced Powerplant Solutions, PRA Runway Woes, Drone Racing

Also: Virgin Galactic, B-29 Doc to Allentown, Erickson Fire-Fighters Bought, FAA Reauthorization After dealing with a big letdown after the unexpected decision by Skyreach to disco>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.06xx.24)

“Our aircrews are trained and capable of rapidly shifting from operational missions to humanitarian roles. We planned to demonstrate how we, and our BORSTAR partners, respond>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC