Planemakers Pitch For Ban On Lithium Battery Shipments | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Mar 13, 2015

Planemakers Pitch For Ban On Lithium Battery Shipments

Calls Threat Of Fire An 'Unacceptable Risk'

An airline industry position paper released by the  International Coordination Council of Aerospace Industry Associations (ICCAIA) and the International Federation of Air Line Pilots Associations calls for a formal ban on the bulk shipments of lithium-ion and lithium-metal batteries in the cargo holds of passenger airliners.

The ICCAIA represents such planemakers as Boeing and Airbus. It additionally called for stronger regulations regarding the packaging and handling of the batteries shipped on cargo aircraft.

The paper calls the shipments on passenger airplanes an "unacceptable risk," and points out that aircraft tests show that fire protection systems on airplanes are "unable to suppress or extinguish a fire involving significant quantities of lithium batteries, resulting in reduced time available for safe flight and landing of an aircraft to a diversion airport. Therefore, continuing to allow the carriage of lithium batteries within today's transport category aircraft cargo compartments is an unacceptable risk to the air transport industry."

Both Delta and United Airlines have banned lithium battery shipments on board their passenger planes.

The Associated Press reports that in 2012, Congress passed a law that says U.S. regulators cannot impose rules that concerning battery shipments that are more stringent that those approved by the ICAO unless it can be proven that a battery shipment caused a fire that led to an accident. While recent incidents involving cargo planes destroyed by fire in which the batteries are suspected, the damage has been so extensive that investigators have been unable to prove that the batteries were the cause of the fire.

(Image captured from FAA video)

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.25.24): Airport Rotating Beacon

Airport Rotating Beacon A visual NAVAID operated at many airports. At civil airports, alternating white and green flashes indicate the location of the airport. At military airports>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.25.24)

Aero Linx: Fly for the Culture Fly For the Culture, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that serves young people interested in pursuing professions in the aviation industry>[...]

Klyde Morris (04.22.24)

Klyde Is Having Some Issues Comprehending The Fed's Priorities FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC