NTSB Prelim Posted For Zenair Forced Landing Incident | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Sun, Nov 10, 2013

NTSB Prelim Posted For Zenair Forced Landing Incident

Pilot Was Conducting Phase 1 Testing Of His Airplane

A phase 1 testing flight for a Zenair 701 ended with a forced landing after the airplane developed problems during the flight. Neither person on board the airplane, one the airplane's sport-pilot owner and the other a pilot-rated passenger, was injured in the incident.

The airplane didn't fare so well. According to the NTSB's preliminary report, on October 19, 2013, about 1130 eastern daylight time, an experimental amateur built Zenair 701, N538HB, was substantially damaged during a forced landing, after a loss of engine power, in Zephyrhills, Florida.  Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the local personal flight conducted under the provisions of Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91, which departed from Zephyrhills Municipal Airport (ZPH), Zephyrhills, Florida.

According to the pilot, the purpose of the flight was to complete phase 1 testing to show that the experimental amateur built airplane was in compliance with Federal Aviation Administration requirements that required that it be capable of safe flight. After pulling the airplane out of the hangar he asked another pilot to fly with him and monitor the engine instruments and overall performance of the airplane. After a thorough preflight, he agreed to go with him. After taxiing to the runup area for runway 22, the pilot went through the pretakeoff procedure, and checked for other airplanes that may have been taking off or landing. He then radioed his intention to takeoff, and departed.

He climbed the airplane to 1,000 feet above mean sea level (msl) and departed the traffic pattern straight out on the runway heading.  After a “few” turns, he established straight and level flight at a power setting of 75 percent of rated power, and then proceeded back to ZPH for some “touch and go” landings. After arriving at ZPH, He made a normal approach to runway 22 at 60 knots, and after touching down, applied full power, lifted off, and established a best rate of climb speed of 60 knots which resulted in a 400 feet per minute rate of climb. He then turned onto the crosswind leg of the traffic pattern, and when he reached 500 feet, announced his intention to do another “touch and go” landing over the radio.

A pilot of another airplane then transmitted that he was leaving the airport traffic pattern and asked whether the pilot had his airplane in sight. The pilot responded over the radio that he saw him and that he would extend the crosswind leg of the traffic pattern to make sure that they had “good spacing”. The pilot then turned onto the downwind leg of the traffic pattern, and the engine suddenly “overreved”. The pilot pulled back the throttle, and picked out an “emergency landing spot”. He tried adding power but, the “propeller” did not respond. He was now at 700 feet msl, and he did not have much time to make a decision about the spot he was going to land at. He then slowed the airplane to 55 knots as he approached a set of power transmission lines. As he came into close proximity with them, he slowed to 45 knots, passed under the lines, “stalled” the airplane, and then touched down hard substantially damaging the airplane.

(Image from file. Not accident airplane)

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.25.24): Airport Rotating Beacon

Airport Rotating Beacon A visual NAVAID operated at many airports. At civil airports, alternating white and green flashes indicate the location of the airport. At military airports>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.25.24)

Aero Linx: Fly for the Culture Fly For the Culture, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that serves young people interested in pursuing professions in the aviation industry>[...]

Klyde Morris (04.22.24)

Klyde Is Having Some Issues Comprehending The Fed's Priorities FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC