Port Authority Slaps Limits On Teterboro | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Jun 21, 2005

Port Authority Slaps Limits On Teterboro

Too Much Traffic And Some Of It Is Too Heavy

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Monday slapped strict limits on the number and weight of aircraft that can fly into Teterboro, NJ, and plans to impose higher landing fees for those aircraft that continue to operate at the airport new New York City.

Gone will be Federal Reserve overnight flights and all Stage Two aircraft -- noisier jets built more than 20-years ago.

"We have to be very aggressive," said Port Authority Chairman Anthony Coscia, quoted by the Newark Star-Ledger. He was testifying at a hearing of the Senate Legislative Oversight Committee. "We need to reduce the flights at Teterboro."

Permissible weight limits would be reduced from 100,000 pounds to 80,000 under the PA's plan.

Some lawmakers applauded the PA's decision. "This is the first time we've had aggressive action like this from the Port Authority," NJ State Sen. Paul Sarlo told the Star-Ledger. "Previous administrations have taken a hands-off approach to requests for reducing flights, claiming it was a federal issue beyond their control. But I just have to believe a bistate agency overseeing the major metropolitan airports will have the needed clout with the FAA."

Others thought it wasn't enough.

"Conditions at the airport are unsafe and a 25 percent reduction is called for immediately in order to reduce a reasonable level the possibility of a terrible accident occurring there," State Rep. Steve Rothman told the Newark paper. He had asked for a Stage Two ban seven years ago, but got nowhere with the request.

"All four proposed actions would require review by FAA and would be subject to our approval before anything can be implemented," FAA spokesman Jim Peters told the Star-Ledger.

There was no immediate indication when the new restrictions and fees would be made effective -- and there was no indication of what those new fees would be. But already, some Teterboro-based pilots are worried about paying more and flying less.

FMI: www.teb.com/aviation/tetframe.HTM

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.25.24): Airport Rotating Beacon

Airport Rotating Beacon A visual NAVAID operated at many airports. At civil airports, alternating white and green flashes indicate the location of the airport. At military airports>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.25.24)

Aero Linx: Fly for the Culture Fly For the Culture, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that serves young people interested in pursuing professions in the aviation industry>[...]

Klyde Morris (04.22.24)

Klyde Is Having Some Issues Comprehending The Fed's Priorities FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC