AG Disapproves Aircraft Ban At Chatham Municipal Airport | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.01.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.04.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Dec 05, 2025

AG Disapproves Aircraft Ban At Chatham Municipal Airport

Town’s Bylaw Inconsistent With State Law And Not Legal

The Massachusetts State Attorney General’s Office has overturned a bylaw passed by the town of Chatham which voted in its May 2025 annual meeting to pass Article 59 that sought to prohibit aircraft with wingspans larger than 49 feet from landing at Chatham Municipal Airport (KCQX).

A letter from Assistant Attorney General Kelli E. Gunagan to Town Clerk Julie Smith stated that the bylaw was inconsistent with state law and therefore was disapproved.

Article 59 had passed by a margin of 26 votes, with airport critics arguing that the airport was designed to accommodate FAA-designated design group 1 aircraft – smaller airplanes with wingspans under 49 feet – and not turboprop aircraft with longer wingspans that have become more frequent users of the airport.

The critics also assert that the number of flights of the larger aircraft have exceeded the limit set by the FAA such that additional safety standards must be met.

Gunagan found that Article 59 was not consistent with the law since the Massachusetts legislature granted sole authority to regulate public airports to the Aeronautics Division of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation.

Gunagan did not make any determination regarding the policy issue concerning the size or type of aircraft using the airport.

She wrote, “A town’s independent authority to regulate airports is narrow, extending only to private landing areas,” adding that the bylaw does not fall within that narrow area. “Moreover, prohibiting certain aircraft from using the airport ‘prevents the achievement of a clearly identified purpose,’ namely that the responsibility for supervision and control of aeronautics has been confirmed upon MassDOT by the legislature,” while citing a decision involving the town of Wendell.

Gunagan also added in a footnote that the bylaw may be preempted by grant assurances the town agreed to when it accepted federal funds.

FMI:  www.faa.gov/

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.04.25): Cooperative Surveillance

Cooperative Surveillance Any surveillance system, such as secondary surveillance radar (SSR), wide-area multilateration (WAM), or ADS-B, that is dependent upon the presence of cert>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.04.25)

Aero Linx: OX5 Aviation Pioneers Incorporated in 1955 as a Pa 501 (c)(3) Not for Profit Corporation, the OX5 Aviation Pioneers is dedicated to bringing before the public the accomp>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Extra Flugzeugproduktions EA 300/SC

The Pilot Appeared To Regain Control After Six Rotations And Attempted To “Fly Out” Inverted But Had Insufficient Altitude On November 8, 2025, at 1038 eastern standard>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Bally Bomber - The All Time Ultimate Warbird Replica?

From 2018 (YouTube Edition): Aero-News Talks With The Airplane's Builder One of the many unique airplanes at AirVenture 2018 was a 1/3-scale B-17 bomber built by Jack Bally, who ta>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.05.25)

Aero Linx: Society of U.S. Army Flight Surgeons (SoUSAFS) The Society of US Army Flight Surgeons (SoUSAFS) serves to advance the science and art of Aerospace Medicine and its allie>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC