Developer Calls FAA Land Use Rules 'Extortion' | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.04.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Dec 09, 2010

Developer Calls FAA Land Use Rules 'Extortion'

Land Owner Objects To FAA Prohibition Against "Wildlife Attractants"

A real estate developer says that land use restrictions imposed by the FAA around the Acadiana Regional Airport (KARA) amounts to extortion on the part of the agency. He is objecting to the need for FAA approval for development within a 10,000 foot radius of the airport.

Developer Chris Jordon told the Daily Iberian that if the FAA wants to have the right to approve use of land around the airport, they should be required to buy the land. At the core of the issue are two wastewater treatment ponds under development at the south end of the runway, and a landfill at the northern end. Jordon said that the land, which in his estimation is worth some $5,000 per acre, should be paid for by the agency "if FAA's giving out money."

Gordon Doerle, who owns the landfill, agreed that if the FAA wants to control what is built on the land then they should have to pay for it. Both see the issue as one of basic property rights.

FAA spokeswoman Lynn Lunsford said that "grant assurances" are put in place at airports which receive federal funding because they are "important to the National Airport System" to ensure safety at those airports. The problem at KARA is that both the landfill and the treatment ponds can attract birds or other wildlife, which can be a safety issue near airports. Lunsford said KARA is being held to the same standards as other airports. Neither the landfill or the sewerage treatment ponds comply with FAA advisory circulars outlining development acceptable near an airport.

Airport Authority Commissioner Ken Squires told the paper that the FAA has been "a knight in ... shining armor" for helping improve the airport. He said a comprehensive land use ordinance is needed to put the issue to bed. He said the Parish is at fault for allowing the two non-compliant entities to purchase land near the airport. "If you're dumb enough to buy land at the end of a runway, you should deal with the consequences," he said.

FMI: www.faa.gov, www.iberiaparishgovernment.com

Advertisement

More News

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Rutan Long-EZ

The Pilot Attempted Several Times To Restart The Engine And Diverted To Long Beach Airport/Daughtery Field On October 20, 2025, about 1603 Pacific daylight time, an experimental am>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.05.25): Hazardous Weather Information

Hazardous Weather Information Summary of significant meteorological information (SIGMET/WS), convective significant meteorological information (convective SIGMET/WST), urgent pilot>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.05.25)

"The latest development underscores the government of Malaysia’s commitment in providing closure to the families affected by this tragedy..." Source: From statements made by >[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 12.04.25: Ldg Fee Danger, Av Mental Health, PC-7 MKX

Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC