NJ Senator Calls For End To Airline Fuel Surcharges | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Wed, Oct 22, 2008

NJ Senator Calls For End To Airline Fuel Surcharges

Airlines Reluctant To Part With Revenue Stream

If an airline imposes a "fuel surcharge" above and beyond the normal fare to compensate for record fuel prices, it's hard to argue with that. The assumption, of course, is that if jet fuel prices fall nearly in half, the surcharge will be reduced or eliminated.

If the airlines keep collecting those fees after fuel costs fall nearly in half over a six-month period, and make excuses for keeping them in place, is it fair to call them "fuel surcharges?" That's the point US Senator Robert Menendez, New Jersey's Democrat junior senator, is making to 11 US airlines.

Newsday reports Menendez has sent letters calling on the airlines to discontinue the fees, which were blamed on fuel costs when imposed. He notes the price paid by airlines for jet fuel averaged $2.34 a gallon last week, down 45 percent from an average of $4.33 in July.

"It's deceptive to say you still need a fuel surcharge when aviation fuel prices are down $2 per gallon," Menendez said. "It's just wrong."

It may be tough to get the airlines to let go. Industry rhetoric seems to suggest that rising fuel prices were simply another opportunity to add a revenue line to the budget, not directly linked to fuel costs.

David Castelveter, a spokeman for the American Transport Association, an airline trade group, told Newsday the decision on removing surcharges will be made, not in response to actual fuel prices, but rather by market forces. "The US airline industry continues to operate with uncertainty. We're going to lose several billion dollars this year," he said.

Gerard Arpey, CEO of American Airlines parent company AMR, observed last week that it would be "shortsighted to conclude that fuel prices, which remain volatile, are no longer a challenge."

AMR VP Beverly Goulet recently bragged to stock analysts that fees, including those levied for fuel and checked bags, are bringing in "several hundred millions of dollars" for her company.

All this raises the question -- If the fuel charges are staying put because passengers seem to pay them without complaint, why didn't airlines just raise the base fares, and skip all the hidden charges?

FMI: www.airlines.org, http://menendez.senate.gov/

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-23

Pilot Also Reported That Due To A Fuel Leak, The Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Were Not Used On June 4, 2025, at 13:41 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-23, N2109P, was substantially damage>[...]

ANN FAQ: Submit a News Story!

Have A Story That NEEDS To Be Featured On Aero-News? Here’s How To Submit A Story To Our Team Some of the greatest new stories ANN has ever covered have been submitted by our>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: One Man’s Vietnam

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Reflections on War’s Collective Lessons and Cyclical Nature The exigencies of war ought be colorblind. Inane social-constructs the likes of racis>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.03.25)

Aero Linx: Colorado Pilots Association (CPA) Colorado Pilots Association was incorporated as a Colorado Nonprofit Corporation in 1972. It is a statewide organization with over 700 >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.03.25): High Speed Taxiway

High Speed Taxiway A long radius taxiway designed and provided with lighting or marking to define the path of aircraft, traveling at high speed (up to 60 knots), from the runway ce>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC