Owner Of Damaged TBM Sues FBO, Owner | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.19.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.21.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.23.25

Mon, Jan 23, 2012

Owner Of Damaged TBM Sues FBO, Owner

Charges Irresponsibility, Misleading Advertising

The owner of a turboprop aircraft has retained an attorney and filed suit against a Groton, CT FBO and its owner after his plane was damaged by a fuel truck while in for repairs. The FBO acknowledges its role, and says it has insurance, but the lawsuit may be attempting to reach past the corporate "veil" to target the owner personally.

TheDay.com reports George Sampas flew his 2006 Socata TBM (similar plane pictured) to the Groton airport on August 9, 2011 to be repaired by Lanmar Aviation. In his complaint filed in U.S. District Court, Sampas alleges FBO employees completed the repairs, but then backed a fuel truck into the plane, forcing it off its chocks and damaging the tail and fuselage.

The suit claims that Lanmar, and its owner and president, Richard Polidori neglected to maintain standard operating and safety procedures, and adds that that the company's claim of high safety standards in its advertising is misleading. Sampas explained in a phone interview with TheDay, ""The fact that they didn't have adequate safety procedures in place is irresponsible. They advertise themselves as being a safe FBO."

The repairs are estimated at $400,000, but Sampas also wants $20,000 per month for loss of use, and claims that even after repairs, the plane won't be worth what it was before the damage was done. He wants a total of $690,000 in compensation, or for Lanmar to buy the plane from his for what it would have been worth before the accident.

Attorney Steven Arnold is representing Polidori, and has moved to dismiss the suit. He notes that Lanmar, through its insurance company, has acknowledged the company's responsibility, and says Sampas has no grounds to sue Polidori personally.

FMI: www.lanmaraviation.net ; www.tbm850.com

Advertisement

More News

Oshkosh Memories: An Aero-News Stringer Perspective

From 2021: The Inside Skinny On What Being An ANN Oshkosh Stringer Is All About By ANN Senior Stringer Extraordinare, Gene Yarbrough The annual gathering at Oshkosh is a right of p>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Diamond Aircraft Ind Inc DA 40 NG

Pilot Asked The Mechanic To Go For A Test Flight Around The Airport Traffic Pattern With Him For A Touch-And-Go Landing, And Then A Full-Stop Landing On May 7, 2025, about 1600 eas>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: US Airways Jeff Skiles-Making History and Looking To The Future

From 2010 (YouTube Edition): Skiles Reflects On His Ring-Side Seat To An Historic Event Jeff Skiles, First Officer of US Airways Flight 1549, "The Miracle on the Hudson," was the g>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.26.25)

“The FAA conducted a comprehensive safety review of the SpaceX Starship Flight 8 mishap and determined that the company has satisfactorily addressed the causes of the mishap,>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.26.25): Fuel Remaining

Fuel Remaining A phrase used by either pilots or controllers when relating to the fuel remaining on board until actual fuel exhaustion. When transmitting such information in respon>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC