New Technology Could Help Highlight Hijacked Aircraft | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.21.25

Airborne-Unlimited-07.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.23.25

Airborne-Unlimited-07.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-07.25.25

Thu, Jun 24, 2004

New Technology Could Help Highlight Hijacked Aircraft

But Is It Necessary?

One of the first things the 9/11 hijackers did once inside the cockpits was to turn off the transponders in three of the four commandeered aircraft. As a result, American Airlines Flight 77 disappeared unnoticed over Cleveland and was off the scope for 36 minutes, only to show up six minutes away from the Pentagon.

Weeks later, the government promised to require airlines beef up their transponders. That promise fell by the wayside, however, as airline revenues dove through the basement floor. In January, 2003, the FAA shelved the proposal that would have required hidden switches which, when activated by flight crew members, would alert controllers with a signal that couldn't be shut off in flight.

While some airlines continue to argue that never-off transponders aren't required now that cockpit doors have been reinforced and other security measures are in place, New York Newsday quotes some safety advocates who say it's a low-cost way to ensure there won't be any more attacks like those on New York and Washington.

"Unless they can assure themselves that there'll never be another hijacking, it might be a really cheap fix," said former FAA security advisory committee member Bob Monetti, in an interview with Newsday.

The proposal shelved last year would have, by industry estimates, cost airlines $11,788 per aircraft. That's a total of $88 million -- a cost the FAA said had to be covered by the airlines themselves. Already bleeding red ink, the airlines balked. The ATA said the chance of another wave of hijack-suicide attacks was "significantly reduced" and the proposal "inefficient and relatively ineffective."

Besides, they argued, the 9/11 hijackers burst into the cockpits of the four airliners in a matter of seconds -- not enough time for flight crew members to reset their transponders to 7500 -- the internationally recognized code for a commandeered aircraft. With reinforced and bullet-proof cockpit doors, flight crews will have plenty of time to reset and squawk, according to the ATA.

While the FAA had wanted transponders improved by March, 2005, it now looks like the entire idea is dead in the water. Even members of Congress, like Representative Peter DeFazio (D-OR), no longer consider the idea among their leading concerns.

 "The transponder issue is probably not at the top of my list," DeFazio said. Instead, he would rather see improvements in passenger and baggage screening.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 07.18.25: Will MOSAIC Be Announced Tuesday???, 12 Hot News Items

Also: DeltaHawk, Piper, Hartzell, High Flying Models & Bob Hoover Legacy, SUN n FUN26 and Affordable Flying Expo 2025 -- and MUCH More. In an exclusive interview earlier this m>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 07.10.25: ATC School, Air Race Classic, Samson School

Also: Sully v Bedford, Embraer Scholarships, NORAD Intercepts 11, GAMA Thankful Middle Georgia State University will be joining the Federal Aviation Administration’s fight ag>[...]

Airborne 07.18.25: Will MOSAIC Be Announced Tuesday???, 12 Hot News Items

Also: DeltaHawk, Piper, Hartzell, High Flying Models & Bob Hoover Legacy, SUN n FUN26 and Affordable Flying Expo 2025 -- and MUCH More. In an exclusive interview earlier this m>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.16.25)

Aero Linx: Minnesota Seaplane Pilots Association (MSPA) We are the Minnesota Seaplane Pilots Association (MSPA), a nonprofit organization dedicated to supporting and empowering sea>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.16.25): Preferred IFR Routes

Preferred IFR Routes Routes established between busier airports to increase system efficiency and capacity. They normally extend through one or more ARTCC areas and are designed to>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC