Report: TSA Screeners Failed To Detect Explosives | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.12.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.13.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.14.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-05.15.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.16.25

Mon, Mar 20, 2006

Report: TSA Screeners Failed To Detect Explosives

GAO Says 21 Airports Tested... All Fail

Investigators who conducted secret tests of baggage screeners at nearly two dozen airports made a disturbing -- but perhaps not surprising -- find: according to a GAO report, all of the workers failed to detect bomb-making components and explosives hidden in luggage.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) conducted the clandestine review of airport security throughout the country. News reports indicate bomb making materials were passed through Transportation Security Administration passenger screening at 21 airports, without being detected.

"The fact that government investigators were able to pass through TSA's screening at 21 major airports with bomb making materials is frightening," said Rep. Bennie G. Thompson (D-MS), Ranking Member of the Committee on Homeland Security, in a release by House Democrats.

"It's like the story of the Trojan Horse," Thompson added. "TSA has spent so much time telling people to take off their shoes and belts, that they have missed the bomb making materials."

The actual report, first reported by NBC News, remains classified. Which airports were tested is also unknown.

Despite evidence that at least some screeners are ineffective at what could be deemed their primary purpose, Homeland Security Assistant Secretary and TSA Chief Edmund "Kip" Hawley didn't argue with the apparent findings in the report -- nor did he seem particularly concerned.

While calling the report "interesting," and helpful, Hawley added it is "not at all an evaluation of the entire system. It's a data point on that one particular thing."

Hawley said the report doesn't take into account the levels of security that occur before passengers go through screening -- and once they're through. That includes checks of travelers' names against federal watch lists and behavioral analyses.

"This should not be an alarming report," Hawley said a briefing.

FMI: www.tsa.gov

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Prelim: Hy-Tek Hurricane HP

About 100 Ft Above Ground Level, The Engine Lost Total Power On April 14, 2025, about 1003 Pacific daylight time, an experimental amateur-built Hy-Tek Hurricane HP, N9088G, was sub>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.14.25): Flight Check

Flight Check A call-sign prefix used by FAA aircraft engaged in flight inspection/certification of navigational aids and flight procedures. The word “recorded” may be a>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.14.25)

“While our traditional mechanical magnetos will be around for a long time, Hartzell Engine Tech acquired E-MAG to expand its PowerUP Ignition System product portfolio into bo>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.15.25): Primary Radar

Primary Radar A radar system in which a minute portion of a radio pulse transmitted from a site is reflected by an object and then received back at that site for processing and dis>[...]

Airborne 05.12.25: $1M Flying Car, Marion Airport Saved, AirVenture Cup

Also: ‘Sonoran Beauty’ Jump-Qualified, IAG Orders, FAA Shuts Down ATC Oversight, EAA Joins Modern Skies Slovakia-based developer Klein Vision recently unveiled the prod>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC