FAA Proposes $175,000 Civil Penalty Against MIT | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

** AIRBORNE 06.18.13 Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 06.18.13 **

** AIRBORNE 06.14.13 Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 06.14.13**

** AIRBORNE 04.01.13 SPECIAL EDITION of Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 04.01.13 SPECIAL EDITION **

Sat, Sep 03, 2011

FAA Proposes $175,000 Civil Penalty Against MIT

Prestigious University Allegedly Shipped Devices With Lithium Batteries Which Caught Fire

The FAA is proposing a $175,000 civil penalty against the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) for alleged violations of Department of Transportation Hazardous Materials Regulations. The FAA alleges that MIT offered a fiberboard box containing 33 electronic devices to FedEx for transportation by air from Cambridge to Seattle on Aug. 25, 2009.  Each electronic device consisted of a lithium battery attached to a circuit board and tube-like container.

The package was discovered with smoke and flames coming from it while it was moving on a conveyor at the FedEx sorting facility in Medford, MA.  Two of the devices in the package heated and melted, which caused the surrounding cushioning and packaging to catch fire.  Because the package was not properly labeled and marked, Federal Express employees did not know the shipment contained hazardous material. They made several unsuccessful attempts to extinguish the flames with a fire extinguisher.
 
Specifically, the batteries were not packaged in a manner that would prevent a short-circuit that could create sparks or generate a dangerous quantity of heat.  MIT allegedly offered the box when it was not packaged, marked, classed, described, labeled or in condition for shipment as required by regulations.  The airbill accompanying the shipment specifically stated the shipment did not contain dangerous goods.

In addition, the FAA alleges MIT employees were not properly trained and tested to handle hazardous material.

MIT has 30 days from receipt of the FAA’s enforcement letter to respond to the agency.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Lufthansa Firms Up Order For 100 A320 Family Aircraft

German Airline The Largest Airbus Customer And Operator In Europe The Lufthansa Group has firmed up a previous Supervisory Board decision from March this year and signed for 100 A3>[...]

Airborne 06.18.13: Reno Race Shakeup, A350 XWB First Flight, Great Lakes Flies!

Also: Beechcraft Not Happy With GAO, More Damage to GA From FAA, Cessna 172 SAIB, An Inspirational Leap The inability to reach agreement over a number of unsettled restrictions, in>[...]

FAA Requires Operation Migration Pilots To Hold Private Licenses

New Aircraft To Be Purchased With Support From Donors New airplanes will lead endangered whooping cranes from their summer range to Florida for the winter in coming years, and the >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.18.13)

International Federation of Air Traffic Controllers IFATCA is a worldwide organization representing more than fifty thousand air traffic controllers in 134 countries.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.18.13): One-Hundred-Hour Inspection

A complete inspection that is required for all aircraft operated for hire every 100 hours.>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2013 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC