Report: On-Demand Carrier Fatalities Loom Over Excellent Industry Safety Numbers | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

** AIRBORNE 06.18.13 Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 06.18.13 **

** AIRBORNE 06.14.13 Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 06.14.13**

** AIRBORNE 04.01.13 SPECIAL EDITION of Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 04.01.13 SPECIAL EDITION **

Mon, Jul 10, 2006

Report: On-Demand Carrier Fatalities Loom Over Excellent Industry Safety Numbers

Charter Ops Average 2.2 Accidents Per 100,000 Flight Hours, Says Paper

The FAA, NTSB and other agencies are quick to point out to all who will listen that, by the numbers, this is the safest time ever to fly -- with the last major crash involving a domestic airliner occuring in November 2001, when an American Airlines jet went down in Queens, NY.

However, the picture isn't as rosy when you consider another segment of the aviation picture -- on demand operators. Or, more specifically, small cargo aircraft -- the kind that fly small packages and check stubs throughout the country -- as well as air taxis, charter operators and EMS helicopters.

The Miami Herald reports that, on average... one of these aircraft have been involved in a fatal accident every month, from 2000 to 2004.

The private air cargo auditing group Robert E. Breiling Associates told the paper that in 2004 alone, small cargo planes averaged 2.2 crashes for every 100,000 hours of US operation -- compared to rates of 0.11 for corporate jets, 0.13 for scheduled air carriers, 0.90 for business travel and 1.51 for scheduled commuters.

Furthermore, these accidents are up to 50 times more likely to result in fatalities, according to the NTSB.  

Alas, the only category with a higher crash rate is general aviation -- whose accident rate is nearly three times higher.

The Herald does not go into detail on ways to solve this problem... but it cannot be argued that better training would go a long way towards bringing that rate down. Many on demand operators also fly older planes... with older systems and avionics, as opposed to the newer technologies found in more advanced aircraft.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

Aero-TV: Garmin’s GNC-255 –- Back To Basics

Garmin's New Aviation VHF Radios Early this year, a new series of aviation VHF COM and NAV/COM radios, the GTR and GNC series, was announced by Garmin. As the replacement products >[...]

EADS And Siemens Enter Long-Term Research Partnership

Sign MoU With Diamond Aircraft On Electric Propulsion System EADS and Siemens are entering into a long-term research partnership to introduce new electric propulsion systems that c>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.19.13): Ceiling

The heights above the earth's surface of the lowest layer of clouds or obscuring phenomena that is reported as broken, overcast, or obscuration, and not classified as thin or parti>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.19.13)

The Army Aviation Heritage Foundation The Army Aviation Heritage Foundation (AAHF) is a non-profit public educational foundation dedicated to presenting the Army Aviation story to >[...]

Aero-News: Quote Of The Day (06.19.13)

“The serial electric propulsion allows us to design airplanes with totally different characteristics than today. Vertical take-off and high-speed cruise can be realized in a >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2013 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC