Northrop, USAF Ask GAO To Toss Boeing's KC-X Protest | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.10.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Mar 28, 2008

Northrop, USAF Ask GAO To Toss Boeing's KC-X Protest

Boeing Takes Its Fight To Court Of Public Opinion

As expected, the US Air Force and Northrop Grumman Corporation Wednesday filed separate requests to dismiss parts of a protest by Boeing against the award to Northrop of the $35 billion KC-X aerial tanker contract.

Politicians at every level of government in the US have vowed to fight the award to Northrop Grumman, saying Northrop's partnership with the European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company sends what should be US manufacturing jobs overseas.

The KC-45A tanker Northrop plans to build is based on the Airbus A330 airliner. The Air Force filed its own motion with the Government Accountability Office just after 5pm Eastern Time Wednesday, without comment.

"We argue that much of what Boeing complains about was contained in the KC-X request for proposals and should have been questioned, and even perhaps protested, before the submittal of Boeing's final bid," Northrop spokesman Randy Belote told Reuters, regarding his company's separate complaint.

"Filing a protest ... is extremely serious business," he added.

Boeing, meanwhile, appears to believe there is an advantage to be had in encouraging public pressure on politicians. On Wednesday, Boeing took out full-page advertisements in 41 US newspapers, including the Wall Street Journal.

"Repeatedly, fundamental but often unstated changes were made to the bid requirements and evaluation criteria," Boeing alleges in the ads. "These arbitrary changes not only unfairly skewed the results against Boeing; they penalized the warfighter and the taxpayer by selecting an airplane that did not satisfy the Air Force's own bid requirements."

Boeing's protest with the Government Accountability Office, the investigating arm of the US Congress, was filed on March 11. The GAO has 100 days to rule on the matter, putting its deadline at June 19.

FMI: www.globaltanker.com, www.northropgrumman.com/kc45/

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.13.24)

Aero Linx: Florida Antique Biplane Association "Biplanes.....outrageous fun since 1903." That quote really defines what the Florida Antique Biplane Association (FABA) is all about.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.13.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

Airborne 04.09.24: SnF24!, Piper-DeltaHawk!, Fisher Update, Junkers

Also: ForeFlight Upgrades, Cicare USA, Vittorazi Engines, EarthX We have a number of late-breaking news highlights from the 2024 Innovation Preview... which was PACKED with real ne>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.14.24)

“For Montaer Aircraft it is a very prudent move to incorporate such reliable institution as Ocala Aviation, with the background of decades in training experience and aviation>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.14.24): Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC