Port Authority Slaps Limits On Teterboro | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.19.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.21.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.23.25

Tue, Jun 21, 2005

Port Authority Slaps Limits On Teterboro

Too Much Traffic And Some Of It Is Too Heavy

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Monday slapped strict limits on the number and weight of aircraft that can fly into Teterboro, NJ, and plans to impose higher landing fees for those aircraft that continue to operate at the airport new New York City.

Gone will be Federal Reserve overnight flights and all Stage Two aircraft -- noisier jets built more than 20-years ago.

"We have to be very aggressive," said Port Authority Chairman Anthony Coscia, quoted by the Newark Star-Ledger. He was testifying at a hearing of the Senate Legislative Oversight Committee. "We need to reduce the flights at Teterboro."

Permissible weight limits would be reduced from 100,000 pounds to 80,000 under the PA's plan.

Some lawmakers applauded the PA's decision. "This is the first time we've had aggressive action like this from the Port Authority," NJ State Sen. Paul Sarlo told the Star-Ledger. "Previous administrations have taken a hands-off approach to requests for reducing flights, claiming it was a federal issue beyond their control. But I just have to believe a bistate agency overseeing the major metropolitan airports will have the needed clout with the FAA."

Others thought it wasn't enough.

"Conditions at the airport are unsafe and a 25 percent reduction is called for immediately in order to reduce a reasonable level the possibility of a terrible accident occurring there," State Rep. Steve Rothman told the Newark paper. He had asked for a Stage Two ban seven years ago, but got nowhere with the request.

"All four proposed actions would require review by FAA and would be subject to our approval before anything can be implemented," FAA spokesman Jim Peters told the Star-Ledger.

There was no immediate indication when the new restrictions and fees would be made effective -- and there was no indication of what those new fees would be. But already, some Teterboro-based pilots are worried about paying more and flying less.

FMI: www.teb.com/aviation/tetframe.HTM

Advertisement

More News

Oshkosh Memories: An Aero-News Stringer Perspective

From 2021: The Inside Skinny On What Being An ANN Oshkosh Stringer Is All About By ANN Senior Stringer Extraordinare, Gene Yarbrough The annual gathering at Oshkosh is a right of p>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Diamond Aircraft Ind Inc DA 40 NG

Pilot Asked The Mechanic To Go For A Test Flight Around The Airport Traffic Pattern With Him For A Touch-And-Go Landing, And Then A Full-Stop Landing On May 7, 2025, about 1600 eas>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: US Airways Jeff Skiles-Making History and Looking To The Future

From 2010 (YouTube Edition): Skiles Reflects On His Ring-Side Seat To An Historic Event Jeff Skiles, First Officer of US Airways Flight 1549, "The Miracle on the Hudson," was the g>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.26.25)

“The FAA conducted a comprehensive safety review of the SpaceX Starship Flight 8 mishap and determined that the company has satisfactorily addressed the causes of the mishap,>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.26.25): Fuel Remaining

Fuel Remaining A phrase used by either pilots or controllers when relating to the fuel remaining on board until actual fuel exhaustion. When transmitting such information in respon>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC