Failed! Baggage Scales Taken Offline At Tucson International Airport | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Dec 05, 2008

Failed! Baggage Scales Taken Offline At Tucson International Airport

United, Delta Scales Found Not To Be In Compliance

State inspectors removed over a dozen scales used by two airlines from service this week at Tucson International Airport, after the discovery the devices gave false readings.

The Arizona Daily Star reports every scale used by United Airlines and Delta Air Lines at the airport was removed from service Tuesday, after failing tests conducted by the Arizona Department of Weights and Measures. United's scales reportedly lacked security seals, while those used by Delta were improperly set up on pliable surfaces like foam or wood.

Several read higher than they should have, while at least one showed lighter weights. Airlines use the scales to weigh checked luggage... and, to charge for overweight bags. Delta charges $90 for each bag weighing between 51-90 pounds, and $175 for bags between 71 and 100 pounds. United charges a staggering $125 for bags that are even a pound greater than the 50-lb cutoff.

To pass inspection, the scales must be properly installed and show weights within a 1/2 pound of actual. All eight scales used by Delta, and six used by United, failed to meet state standards. In addition to the hassle of taking the scales off-line, the carriers face a fine of at least $300 for each scale found to be not in compliance.

Admittedly, the inspection process is imperfect. Weights and Measures spokesman Steve Meissner said the scales in Tucson were last inspected in 2004, far longer than the once-a-year schedule in place at Phoenix Sky Harbor. There are over 30 inspectors statewide who, in addition to checking airport scales, also certify the accuracy of gas pumps, and truck scales... but Meissner says only four of them are based in the southern part of the state.

The scales will be out of service until they are repaired by state-approved technicians and the agency can recheck them... leaving both carriers to find alternate ways of measuring luggage weights.

United said this week it would suspend weighing checked bags for the short-term. "Customers won't be charged for overweight bags until we recertify the scales," said spokesman Jeff Kovick. "Over the summer our scales were certified (by private technicians) and then checked again more recently. We'll fully investigate why they didn't pass inspection."

Delta appears to be taking a more proactive approach, hiring their own contractors to check and recalibrate the scales... which will then need to be certified by state officials. In the meantime, Delta will use scales belonging to other airlines.

Anthony Black, spokesman for the Atlanta-based carrier, tried to downplay any whisper of impropriety on the part of his employer. While technically the inaccurate scales could have been used to fraudulently charge passengers overweight fees, he said the airline's own checks only showed them to be off by about a pound... within the threshold where ticket agents either ask passengers to remove items from their luggage, or simply look the other way.

United's Kovick said he didn't have any information about how many passengers had asked for refunds on overweight fees due to the mess.

Incidentally, we can probably all expect to read more stories like this one, too... as such testing has piqued the public's interest following last month's shuttering of 14 percent of the scales used by airlines at New York's LaGuardia and JFK International Airports, due to -- you guessed it -- inaccurate readings.

FMI: www.delta.com, www.united.com, www.tucsonairport.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.25.24): Airport Rotating Beacon

Airport Rotating Beacon A visual NAVAID operated at many airports. At civil airports, alternating white and green flashes indicate the location of the airport. At military airports>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.25.24)

Aero Linx: Fly for the Culture Fly For the Culture, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that serves young people interested in pursuing professions in the aviation industry>[...]

Klyde Morris (04.22.24)

Klyde Is Having Some Issues Comprehending The Fed's Priorities FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC