Armadillo Aerospace Wins $350,000 Prize In Lunar Lander Challenge | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.10.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Oct 27, 2008

Armadillo Aerospace Wins $350,000 Prize In Lunar Lander Challenge

Annual Competition Spurs Private Development Of Space Vehicles

The Northrup Grumman Lunar Lander Challenge has finally had to spend some of NASA's Centennial Challenges prize money. Armadillo Aerospace won the Level One Challenge at this past weekend's competition in Las Cruces, NM.

The Level One Challenge required competing spacecraft to lift off and climb vertically 50 meters; translate 100 meters horizontally; and make a controlled vertical descent to land on a second pad, with a required minimum duration of 90 seconds for the flight, and a return flight to the original launch pad within 2-and-a-half hours.

Last year, Armadillo had an engine shutdown commanded by an onboard computer seven seconds before reaching its goal. In 2006, it failed when a landing gear leg broke.

But the Las Cruces Sun-News reports that on Friday, the upstart commercial spacecraft developer completed both flights required to win the $350,000. A later attempt at the Level Two Challenge, which doubles the hover-time minimum and adds a requirement to land on an uneven, simulated lunar surface, was unsuccessful, leaving an additional $1.65 million in prize money unclaimed for a third year.

After the event, Armadillo Team Leader John Carmack told reporters, "It's great that we won the Level One, but we're going to keep working towards Level Two, which we can hopefully compete for again soon. We know exactly what we need to nail down and we expect to have it solved in the next couple of weeks."

Ten teams originally declared their intent to compete in this year's event. One dropped out before teams were publicly identified. Of the remaining nine, only Armadillo and TrueZer0 actually flew machines at this year's event.

This year's competition took place at the Las Cruces International Airport, reportedly moved there on short notice after the US Air Force withdrew its permission to hold the event at Holloman Air Force Base. Armadillo's first attempt at Level One Challenge ended early after officials in charge of closing the airspace to regular traffic didn't provide a long enough window to accommodate the flight.

NASA is funding the competition to spur development of private space vehicles that can land instruments on the moon's surface.

FMI: http://space.xprize.org/lunar-lander-challenge

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.13.24)

Aero Linx: Florida Antique Biplane Association "Biplanes.....outrageous fun since 1903." That quote really defines what the Florida Antique Biplane Association (FABA) is all about.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.13.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

Airborne 04.09.24: SnF24!, Piper-DeltaHawk!, Fisher Update, Junkers

Also: ForeFlight Upgrades, Cicare USA, Vittorazi Engines, EarthX We have a number of late-breaking news highlights from the 2024 Innovation Preview... which was PACKED with real ne>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.14.24)

“For Montaer Aircraft it is a very prudent move to incorporate such reliable institution as Ocala Aviation, with the background of decades in training experience and aviation>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.14.24): Maximum Authorized Altitude

Maximum Authorized Altitude A published altitude representing the maximum usable altitude or flight level for an airspace structure or route segment. It is the highest altitude on >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC