AOPA President Goes Before Congress In Opposition To User Fees | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Mar 21, 2007

AOPA President Goes Before Congress In Opposition To User Fees

Boyer Cites Detrimental Effects On GA In Other Countries

Radical changes to the way the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is funded are standing in the way of modernizing America’s air traffic control system. That's the core message the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) delivered to Congress Wednesday, in prepared testimony to the House Aviation subcommittee.

In his written statement, AOPA President Phil Boyer told how the FAA has spent the last two years manufacturing a funding crisis to justify a switch from a tried-and-true funding mechanism, to a system of air traffic control user fees and huge increases in taxes on general aviation users -- one that AOPA says actually provides less money, and has proven extremely detrimental to general aviation whenever it has been implemented anywhere in the world.

"[T]his is nothing less than the government backing away from a world-renowned air transportation system and setting in motion the steps towards privatizing the Air Traffic Control (ATC) system," Boyer stated.

"My request to you, Mr. Chairman and members of the Subcommittee, reject the calls for user fees for any segment of aviation [original emphasis] and the almost quadrupling of general aviation fuel taxes," said Boyer. "Then we can all get on with the real issues at hand through a productive, meaningful discussion on how to strengthen the nation’s airports and modernize air traffic control."

The FAA is currently funded by a combination of fuel excise taxes, airline passenger ticket taxes, taxes on air cargo, and a contribution from the general tax fund.

Boyer (right) states no fewer than three government agencies have said the current system is sufficient. Both the Government Accountability Office and the Congressional Budget Office have testified that ATC modernization can be accomplished under the current funding structure. The Inspector General's office of the US Department of Transportation has also stated that the current tax system can finance the FAA while increasing spending for the so-called Next Generation Air Transportation System as long as there is a general fund contribution, according to AOPA.

In his prepared testimony, Boyer explained an AOPA financial analysis of the current structure that shows that the FAA could spend some $20 billion on ATC modernization over a five year reauthorization time frame and still end up with an uncommitted balance in the Aviation Trust Fund of more than $7 billion.

The FAA has repeatedly pointed to other nations that have switched to a user fee-based funding mechanism. But Boyer told Congress, "Seventy percent of the world's general aviation aircraft and the majority of the world's licensed and active general aviation pilot population resides in America, which makes comparisons of our air transportation system to other countries' almost impossible."

Boyer cited the safety implications of user fees and congestion-based pricing (another FAA proposal), highlighting the dilemma a general aviation pilot would face in Germany. There, a pilot faced with deteriorating weather conditions would face a $1,000 penalty for deciding for safety reasons to use a precision approach at an air carrier airport.

"This is due," Boyer said, "to user fee pricing schemes and congestion management principles aimed at deterring general aviation pilots from using the services that end up affecting safety decisions."

Boyer also noted a former proponent of a fee-based system in Australia attributes a 28% decline in general aviation activity over the past 20 years in that country to user fees.

Dick Smith, the former head of Australia's Civil Aviation Authority, recently observed, "User pays (as we call it here) or the commercialization of Civil Aviation Safety Authority and Airservices, has been a disaster for general aviation in Australia and I believe the same will happen in the USA if it goes ahead."

Boyer told panel members that a survey of AOPA's nearly 411,000 members bears that out. If the FAA funding proposal, with its user fees and 344% fuel tax increase, is approved, he said, "Nine out of ten AOPA members have told us that ... they will reduce or curtail their flying."

Boyer laid out five key assumptions and principles for the members of Congress:

  • The United States has the safest and most efficient air transportation system in the world, moving more aircraft and more people than the rest of the world combined.
  • Excise taxes, not user fees, are the appropriate and cost-efficient way for all aviation users to support the system.
  • Congress' direct management and oversight of FAA spending and programs should not be changed.
  • National transportation assets vital to the United States economy require a level of support from general tax revenues. The general fund contribution to FAA operations should be maintained at the historical average of 21.5% of the FAA budget.
  • Airports are as critical to the aviation transportation system as on- and offramps are to our federal highway system. Federal airport funding should be sustained at no less than the current levels ($3.7 billion).

AOPA, the general aviation community, the airlines, and the FAA all recognize the need to modernize Air Traffic Control. "Amazingly, these are points which almost all of us agreed need to be accomplished," Boyer said. "With user fees off the table, we can move forward on the real issues."

FMI: www.aopa.org, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.15.24)

Aero Linx: International Flying Farmers IFF is a not-for-profit organization started in 1944 by farmers who were also private pilots. We have members all across the United States a>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: 'No Other Options' -- The Israeli Air Force's Danny Shapira

From 2017 (YouTube Version): Remembrances Of An Israeli Air Force Test Pilot Early in 2016, ANN contributor Maxine Scheer traveled to Israel, where she had the opportunity to sit d>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.15.24)

"We renegotiated what our debt restructuring is on a lot of our debts, mostly with the family. Those debts are going to be converted into equity..." Source: Excerpts from a short v>[...]

Airborne 04.16.24: RV Update, Affordable Flying Expo, Diamond Lil

Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.16.24): Chart Supplement US

Chart Supplement US A flight information publication designed for use with appropriate IFR or VFR charts which contains data on all airports, seaplane bases, and heliports open to >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC