Tue, Feb 19, 2013
Will Not Place Lithium-Ion Batteries Into Service Aboard A350 XWB
While saying it is confident that the lithium ion (Li-ion) main battery architecture it has been developing with Saft and qualifying for the A350 XWB aircraft is robust and safe, there will not be any of the batteries aboard the airplanes when it enters service, the company says.
In a news release, Airbus said that the A350 XWB flight test program will continue as planned with the qualified Li-ion main batteries. However, to date, the root causes of the two recent industry Li-ion main batteries incidents remain unexplained to the best of our knowledge. In this context, and with a view to ensuring the highest level of programme certainty, Airbus has decided to activate its “Plan B” and therefore to revert back to the proven and mastered nickel cadmium main batteries for its A350 XWB programme at Entry into Service (EIS). Airbus considers this to be the most appropriate way forward in the interest of programme execution and A350 XWB reliability.
In parallel, Airbus has also launched additional maturity studies on Li-ion main batteries behavior in aerospace operations and will naturally take on board the findings of the ongoing official investigation.
As a result of making this decision now, Airbus does not expect it to impact the A350 XWB Entry Into Service schedule.
A True Aviation Pioneer Talks About The Future of GA Originally Webcast, 05.30.12: Even to many who have to compete with him, Bob Showalter is "Mr. FBO." A veteran of decades of se>[...]
Electric VTOL Aircraft Is Turning Heads In France Among the thousands of aircraft and products on display at the Paris Air Show getting a lot of attention this week is one that may>[...]
Professional Helicopter Pilots Association This website provides valuable information to helicopter operators, including quick access to TFR maps, Homeland Security bulletins, form>[...]
Transport of warm air into an area by horizontal winds. Low-level warm advection sometimes is referred to (erroneously) as overrunning. Although the two terms are not properly inte>[...]
“We have clearly heard the voice of scientists and their unanimous recommendations to change the proposal. From now on, nobody can claim ‘We did not know’." Sourc>[...]