Fri, Apr 27, 2012
Union Challenges Cargo Exclusion From Rest Rule
The Independent Pilots Association (UPS pilots) has filed its petitioner's brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit challenging the FAA's exclusion of cargo operations from new rules governing pilot duty and rest requirements. In a statement released to the media, IPA's General Counsel William Trent said that the FAA acted contrary to Congress' mandate when the Agency published new pilot duty and rest rules in December excluding the cargo segment of U.S. commercial aviation, which he called "vast and growing." Trent said Congress specifically directed the FAA to address the problem of pilot fatigue by issuing new rules based on the best available science.
"The FAA initially agreed stating that the old rules 'are inadequate to guard against fatigue and present an unacceptable risk to the public," Trent said. "Yet the same agency, under intense cargo industry pressure, abruptly made a 180 degree turn and left cargo pilots under the same set of flawed rules that the FAA and Congress found lacking."
In the filing, UPS pilots challenge the FAA's decision to exclude cargo operations from the new safety rules for three primary reasons. "First, the FAA's exclusion of cargo was based solely on a 'cost-benefit' analysis Congress never authorized the FAA to employ," Trent said. "Next, the FAA exceeded its authority by relying on a sketchy, imprecise 'cost-benefit' formula that failed to account for benefits even the FAA acknowledged would accrue by applying the new rules to all cargo operations and in failing to consider other obvious benefits. Finally, the FAA failed to provide the public with legally required notice and opportunity to comment both with respect to its intent to treat cargo differently than passenger operations, and with respect to its reliance on a flawed cost-benefit formula that was made public, for the first time, only after announcing the new rule excluding cargo."
Trent said the intent is not to overturn the new rules as they relate to passenger operations, but only to have the Court order the FAA to reconsider the inclusion of cargo operations consistent with its mandate from Congress and laws requiring adequate notice and opportunity for public comment.
The Court has order that the FAA file its respondent's brief by May 24, 2012.
Garmin's New Aviation VHF Radios Early this year, a new series of aviation VHF COM and NAV/COM radios, the GTR and GNC series, was announced by Garmin. As the replacement products >[...]
Sign MoU With Diamond Aircraft On Electric Propulsion System EADS and Siemens are entering into a long-term research partnership to introduce new electric propulsion systems that c>[...]
The heights above the earth's surface of the lowest layer of clouds or obscuring phenomena that is reported as broken, overcast, or obscuration, and not classified as thin or parti>[...]
The Army Aviation Heritage Foundation The Army Aviation Heritage Foundation (AAHF) is a non-profit public educational foundation dedicated to presenting the Army Aviation story to >[...]
“The serial electric propulsion allows us to design airplanes with totally different characteristics than today. Vertical take-off and high-speed cruise can be realized in a >[...]