'Draconian' Landing Fee Increase At Santa Monica Opposed By GA Industry | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

AMA Drone Report

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday

Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne-Unmanned w/AUVSI

Airborne On ANN

AMA 09.21.17

Airborne 09.18.17

Airborne 09.19.17

Airborne 09.20.17

Airborne 09.21.17

Airborne 09.22.17

Airborne-Unmanned 09.19.17

Airborne-YouTube

AMA 09.21.17

Airborne 09.18.17

Airborne 09.19.17

Airborne 09.20.17

Airborne 09.21.17

Airborne 09.22.17

Airborne-Unmanned 09.19.17

NEW!!! 2017 AirVenture Innovation Preview -- YouTube Presentation / Vimeo Presentation

Thu, May 02, 2013

'Draconian' Landing Fee Increase At Santa Monica Opposed By GA Industry

City Council Votes To Boost Fees By 250 Percent

After a meeting that lasted more than four hours on April 30, the Santa Monica City Council voted unanimously for a proposed 250-percent increase in landing fees at the city’s general aviation airport, Santa Monica Municipal Airport (KSMO). In public comments, NBAA argued the increase is unreasonable, and is considering administrative measures to halt the proposal, scheduled to become effective on Aug. 1.

The Santa Monica Patch reports that the landing fees would raise from $2.07 per 1,000 pounds to $5.48. The fee would be assessed on every airplane based at the airport, including those owned by local flight schools, which are currently exempt. Flight school owner Joseph Justice said during the meeting that "If you charge touch and goes ... you intently plan on putting us out of business if there wasn't an exemption for flight schools."

Some pilots called the fee an attempt by the city to close the airport. But Councilwoman Gleam Davis said that the fee increases would not hurt the flight schools, which would simply incorporate them into the cost of flying lessons. She denied that it was an "underhanded attempt to close the airport."

NBAA Chief Operating Officer Steve Brown urged against the increase at the meeting, alongside dozens of members of the local aviation community, including pilots, flight instructors, maintenance specialists and FBO representatives. “We’re clearly disappointed the Council rushed ahead with this plan, with very limited transparency into the financial assumptions used to justify it,” said Brown. “NBAA is considering filing a formal complaint with the FAA, for a review of whether the proposal complies with federal guidelines.”

In Brown’s comments at the meeting and in documents filed with the council, NBAA argued the increase raises several significant concerns related to compliance with FAA provisions. First, said Brown, the fee increase may create a budget surplus at the airport through excessive fees. “Essentially, the economic system of the airport becomes a ‘closed loop,’” said Brown. “All revenue from activity on the airport has to be spent for current airport purposes, and cannot be moved ‘downtown’ to the city’s general coffers.”

NBAA’s preliminary analysis indicates that Santa Monica Municipal Airport is already operating with a balanced budget. In the airport’s budget submitted on Feb. 25, it reported $4.4 million in revenue and $4.3 million in expenses. The fee increase would raise revenues by $1.4 million without any clear explanation as to why the increase is required.

City officials have shared a limited number of documents with the aviation community. Those the city has made public are inconsistent, and exclude revenue from businesses on the airport and parking lots, while charging the airport for unspecified “professional services” by the city. Those inconsistencies in the financial assumptions for the fee increase – and the limited time to review them – also could violate FAA provisions, NBAA’s statement argued. “In our view, the process so far has been very opaque,” said Brown. “The City of Santa Monica released paperwork related to the fee increase a few weeks ago. They then met with airport tenants about the proposal on April 18, and they voted on it 12 days later. FAA guidelines indicate that airports need to be open and transparent with their users, and provide adequate time for review and consultation.”

NBAA and Santa Monica tenants also argued the proposal would discriminate against based aircraft, essentially charging them twice for airport infrastructure through fuel flowage and hangar or tie-down fees, by charging them the same landing fees as transient aircraft.

The NBAA is coordinating its response to the fee increase through the Association’s Access Committee, and with NBAA Western Regional Representative Stacy Howard. Brown encouraged all operators who regularly use Santa Monica Airport to review the documents released by the city before the fee increase becomes effective on Aug. 1, and urged them to contact Howard to get involved.

“When people review the financial justification for this,” Brown said,” I don’t think anyone is going to believe a 250-percent landing fee increase is reasonable.”

(Santa Monica airport image from file)

FMI: www.nbaa.org

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 09.22.17: Breitling DC-3, World Aerobatic Championships, CFI Training

Also: Egan PLIMP, Aero-Honesty, Orbital ATK, United Airlines 747, New AIA Boss, Bristow Norway, ABS Celebrates 50th Having departed from Geneva last March, the Breitling DC-3 made >[...]

RFP: ANN Seeking New Site/Facility For Major Studio Upgrade

It's Official: Aggressive Upgrades For New Airborne Programs WILL Require New Digs It's been in development for years, but we're getting to a point where we think we can pull off s>[...]

Airborne-Unmanned 09.19.17: FAA OKs FL Drone Ops, ICAO Registry?, No Pot Drones

Also: FAA Reauthorization, Medical Drone Transport, USMC Quadcopters, Canister Launched UAS, Atlas Dynamics Airborne, primarily based in Jacksonville, FL is starting to recover fro>[...]

AMA Drone Report 09.21.17: AMA Expo West, Parrot Mambo, No Drone Pot Delivery

Also: Drone Injury Study, Cook County-IL, Northeastern Drone Society, Propel Star Wars Drones, GA UAS Integration One of the pinnacle model aviation events of the year is coming up>[...]

AMA Comments On Singer Decision

Dr. Michael Singer’s Victory in A Federal Court Has Serious Legal Potential Rich Hanson, President of the Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA), has issued the following stateme>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2017 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC