But Can It Fight? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

Airborne On ANN

Airborne 06.29.15

Airborne 06.30.15

Airborne 07.01.15

Airborne 06.25.15

Airborne 06.26.15

Airborne Hi-Def On YouTube

Airborne 06.29.15

Airborne 06.30.15

Airborne 07.01.15

Airborne 06.25.15

Airborne 06.26.15

Tue, Sep 28, 2004

But Can It Fight?

Article: Pilots Question Testing Of Combat Capabilities

The V-22 may have risen like the Phoenix from the ashes of two fatal crashes four years ago, but can it do the job it was built to do? That question, posed by the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, comes after the Pentagon admitted the Osprey wasn't tested in the "most severe maneuvers." The reason: executives at Bell's plant in Arlington (TX) and Boeing's helicopter facility in Pennsylvania feared such maneuvers would damage the aircraft.

Does that mean the V-22 might be vulnerable? Does the fact that some violent maneuvers, such as those necessary in evading ground fire, were deleted from the evaluation course mean there are undisclosed flight problems with the aircraft?

"The tactical implications of this limitation have been carefully considered and will continue to be reviewed," said the Pentagon's chief weapons tester, Tom Christie, in an exclusive interview with the Fort Worth paper.

Some veteran helicopter warriors don't like it. "The V-22 won't do the mission it was designed to do," said Bill Lawrence, a former helicopter pilot in Vietnam. He once oversaw the V-22 test program, but retired in 1989, before testing began, according to the Star-Telegram. "For Christie's office to come right out and say that they didn't do the testing simply means they absolutely know the V-22 cannot operate where the average Marine combat pilot is going to have to take it in order to survive."

But Boeing's chief V-22 test pilot, Tom MacDonald, disagrees. "We don't feel there are going to be any limitations on maneuvering this airplane reasonably," he told the Star-Telegram. "Everything you fly has some limits."

Quoting a source close to the testing regime, the Star-Telegram reported pilots specifically skipped a series of violent defensive maneuvers after they were warned by engineers the tests might cause severe rotor damage. In fact, tough but routine tests actually did damage the aircraft.

FMI: www.pma275.navair.navy.mil

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 06.30.15: Defending Santa Monica, Aspen ADS-B, NBAA v Privatization

Also: Spectra Reserves, Aero-Calendar, New Airman Standards, Spaceport America, Pointing Lasers, C-17 Training Network, Seaplane Sim Supporters of the Santa Monica, California Airp>[...]

Hexacopter Blasted Out Of The Air Results In Small Claims Charge

Court Finds In Favor Of Aircraft Owner Back in November last year, Eric Joe was visiting his parent's home in Modesto, CA, and flew his Hexacopter low and slow over what he says wa>[...]

SpaceX Falcon 9 Anomaly Was Apparently In The Booster's Second Stage

First Stage Operated Normally As The Spacecraft Disintegrated More details are emerging from the launch failure Sunday of a SpaceX Falcon 9 booster carrying a Dragon resupply space>[...]

AeroSports Update: Wingfoot One Headed To AirVenture

Goodyear’s Brand New Wingfoot One Airship Makes Its EAA AirVenture Oshkosh Debut This Year. If you think rigid airships are something from the past, it’s time to get a >[...]

AD: Dassault Aviation Airplanes

AD NUMBER: 2015-13-08 PRODUCT: All Dassault Aviation Model FALCON 2000EX airplanes.>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2015 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC