Pentagon Reportedly Overcharging Armed Forces For Fuel | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Sat, May 27, 2017

Pentagon Reportedly Overcharging Armed Forces For Fuel

Using Surpluses For A Variety Of Purposes

The Pentagon has reportedly been overcharging its armed services for fuel, including aviation fuel, to generate extra money for training Syrian rebels, bolster a prescription drug program, and cover unbudgeted costs for the war in Afghanistan.

MSN reports that as much as $6 billion has been generated by overcharging for fuel over the past seven years. 

Since WWII, the Defense Department has used a system under which it purchases fuel centrally and then sells it to the various armed services, which pay for the fuel out of their own budgets. It was intended to reduce redundancy and be more efficient. The Pentagon buys about 4.2 billion gallons of fuel each year.

But according to the report, the services have been charged up to $1 per gallon more than airlines pay for jet fuel on the open market, which has led to what some critics call a "bishop's fund" of $6 billion. 

Congress is aware of the practice, and has routinely approved of the Pentagon's request to divert excess money from fuel sales to other programs as a way of balancing the DOD's checkbook. But some are now asking questions about the practice that has resulted in what has been called a "slush fund" for the Pentagon.

In a statement, the Pentagon admitted that it had collected what it described as "enterprise gains" in the amount of $5.6 billion between 2010 and 2016, but said the discrepancy was due to falling oil prices and an "inherently volatile market."

FMI: Original Report

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.16.24)

Aero Linx: International Business Aviation Council Ltd IBAC promotes the growth of business aviation, benefiting all sectors of the industry and all regions of the world. As a non->[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.16.24)

"During the annual inspection of the B-24 “Diamond Lil” this off-season, we made the determination that 'Lil' needs some new feathers. Due to weathering, the cloth-cove>[...]

Airborne 04.10.24: SnF24!, A50 Heritage Reveal, HeliCycle!, Montaer MC-01

Also: Bushcat Woes, Hummingbird 300 SL 4-Seat Heli Kit, Carbon Cub UL The newest Junkers is a faithful recreation that mates a 7-cylinder Verner radial engine to the airframe offer>[...]

Airborne 04.12.24: SnF24!, G100UL Is Here, Holy Micro, Plane Tags

Also: Seaplane Pilots Association, Rotax 916’s First Year, Gene Conrad After a decade and a half of struggling with the FAA and other aero-politics, G100UL is in production a>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 04.17.24: Feds Need Controllers, Spirit Delay, Redbird

Also: Martha King Scholarship, Montaer Grows, Textron Updates Pistons, FlySto The FAA is hiring thousands of air traffic controllers, but the window to apply will only be open for >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC