FAA To Platinum: Pay Up | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

** AIRBORNE 05.21.13 Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 05.21.13 **

** AIRBORNE 05.17.13 Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 05.17.13 **

** AIRBORNE 04.01.13 SPECIAL EDITION of Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 04.01.13 SPECIAL EDITION **

Fri, Jul 15, 2005

FAA To Platinum: Pay Up

Agency Orders $1.8 Million Fine In TEB Mishap

The FAA has ordered Platinum Jet Management to pay a $1.8 million fine in the wake of a February 2nd mishap at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey, accusing the company of bypassing safety regulations and altering records on the aircraft's weight and balance prior to the flight.

The North Jersey Record obtained a copy of the letter after a request to the FAA.

As ANN reported in real-time February 2nd, the Bombardier CL-600 Challenger rolled across the end of the runway, through a fence, across a highway and into a factory. Remarkably, none of the 11 people involved died in the mishap.

Platinum, grounded by the FAA in March because the FAA said it wasn't licensed to operate as a charter carrier, simply leased another firm's charter certificate. In that way, it could go around requirements on training, drug screening and maintenance.

The FAA has also revoked the charter ticket of Darby Aviation, the Alabama-based company that leased its charter certificate to Platinum.

Aside from allegations of inadequate training, the FAA accused Platinum of faking the weight and balance records, indicating the flight was carrying 3,000 pounds of fuel when, in reality, it was carrying 4,500 pounds of Jet-A.

The NTSB cited weight as a possible factor in the mishap. But the pilots and Platinum's attorney, Michael Moulis, said that wasn't a factor after all. The aircraft simply needed more speed on its take-off roll to compensate for the extra weight, they said.

"[The pilots] knew they were heavy," Moulis said during an earlier interview
 with The Record. "These planes, even though it says they've exceeded maximum gross weight, people do it all the time -- you just add a little more maximum speed."

Flight simulations of the take-off scenario indicated that the aircraft wouldn't have gotten off the ground at normal speed.

The FAA is also going after two other firms that owned Platinum-operated aircraft.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Four Companies Recognized With 2013 EBAA Safety Of Flight Awards

Cited For Focus On Maintaining And Improving Best Practices Four European companies have been recognized for their commitment to safe operations as recipients of the 2013 European >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Viking Engines--Building A Rep For Alternative SportAv Engines

Rotax Is NOT The Only Player In Sport Aviation Propulsion Ya gotta hand to Viking... in an industry so VERY well dominated by Rotax, it takes some serious talent and extraordinary >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.22.13)

The European Cockpit Association The European Cockpit Association (ECA) was created in 1991 and is the representative body of European pilots at European Union (EU) level. It repre>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.22.13): Known Traffic

With respect to ATC clearances, means aircraft whose altitude, position, and intentions are known to ATC.>[...]

Aero-News: Quote Of The Day (05.22.13)

"(T)he PC-24 is a completely new development – not a 'me too product'." Source: Oscar J. Schwenk, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Pilatus, introducing the company's new>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2013 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC