Legal Wrangling Continues Between Longmont, CO And Mile-Hi Skydiving | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.01.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-Unlimited-04.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.12.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Apr 25, 2019

Legal Wrangling Continues Between Longmont, CO And Mile-Hi Skydiving

Judge Denies TRO Request Against The City, But Also Will Not Expedite A Hearing On Airport Rules

The long legal battle between Mile-Hi Skydiving and the City of Longmont, CO will not come to an early resolution, as the city had requested, but a judge has also refused to grant the skydiving company's request for a Temporary Restraining Order against the city.

The Times Call newspaper reports that Mile-Hi had requested the restraining order to prevent the city from implementing a new fee structure for renting land at the airport, and the installation of a surveillance system that would be used to assure that the company's clients land within the designated drop zone in paid-for public area.

The city had asked that Boulder District Judge Thomas Francis Mulvahill hear the case this month, but the hearing has been pushed back until May 31.

In its response to the city's motion to expedite, Mile-Hi had requested the temporary restraining order on the land use fees and video system. But Judge Mulvahill also denied the TRO, saying the company could not seek such relief in the response to the motion, which it had done. The judge also said Mile-Hi failed to establish that the company and its clients are being "irreparably harmed" by the city's actions.

 Mile-Hi continues to seek a preliminary injunction against the fee structure, under which the city charges just under 11 cents per square foot for the drop zone on an annual contract.

The judge also denied the city's request for an expedited hearing on a motion to dismiss the lawsuit on the grounds that the district court lacks jurisdiction in the case. The city argues that only the FAA can decide whether the complaint by Mile-Hi that the city's new airport policy is discriminatory has any merit.

The Longmont City Council met in a closed-door session Tuesday to discuss the case.

(Images from file)

FMI: Source report
Source report

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.15.24)

Aero Linx: International Flying Farmers IFF is a not-for-profit organization started in 1944 by farmers who were also private pilots. We have members all across the United States a>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: 'No Other Options' -- The Israeli Air Force's Danny Shapira

From 2017 (YouTube Version): Remembrances Of An Israeli Air Force Test Pilot Early in 2016, ANN contributor Maxine Scheer traveled to Israel, where she had the opportunity to sit d>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.15.24)

"We renegotiated what our debt restructuring is on a lot of our debts, mostly with the family. Those debts are going to be converted into equity..." Source: Excerpts from a short v>[...]

Airborne 04.16.24: RV Update, Affordable Flying Expo, Diamond Lil

Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.16.24): Chart Supplement US

Chart Supplement US A flight information publication designed for use with appropriate IFR or VFR charts which contains data on all airports, seaplane bases, and heliports open to >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC