Documentary Film Maker Says He Has New Evidence About TWA 800 Explosion | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

** Airborne/NBAA2014 10.24.14 ** HD iPad-Friendly -- Airborne/NBAA2014 10.24.14 **
** Airborne/NBAA2014 10.22.14 ** HD iPad-Friendly -- Airborne/NBAA2014 10.22.14 **
** Airborne/NBAA2014 10.21.14 ** HD iPad-Friendly -- Airborne/NBAA2014 10.21.14 **
** Airborne/NBAA2014 10.20.14 ** HD iPad-Friendly -- Airborne/NBAA2014 10.20.14 **

Fri, Jun 21, 2013

Documentary Film Maker Says He Has New Evidence About TWA 800 Explosion

Former Investigators Say They Have 'Solid Proof' Of An External Detonation

The producer of an as-yet-unreleased documentary says he as "solid proof" that an external detonation brought down TWA Flight 800 in 1996, and is asking the NTSB to re-open its investigation of the accident.

Tom Stalcup told CNN's 'New Day' program that several people have come forward to say there was an "external force" that caused the explosion, and that there is no evidence that the explosion originated in the center fuel tank of the Boeing 747 on July 17, 1996. The film's producers have signed a petition asking the NTSB to re-open the case based on their evidence.

The NTSB said that the explosion likely was caused by an electrical short circuit that ignited fuel vapors in the center tank. "(T)he sources evaluated by the investigation, the most likely was a short circuit outside of the [fuel tank] that allowed excessive voltage to enter it through electrical wiring..." according to the probable cause report.

ABC news reports that six of the investigators who worked on the case say that assessment is incorrect. In a trailer for the film, which will be released next month on Epix, a digital distributor of movies and other content, one investigator says that they did not find any part of the airplane which indicated there was a mechanical failure. ABC reported that the producers of the film do not speculate as to what the external forces might have been.

The Associated Press reports that, according to the petition, the investigators said that after a review of FAA radar evidence as well as new evidence not available to the NTSB at the time of the accident, the probable cause determination is "erroneous and should be reconsidered and modified accordingly."

Jim Speer, an accident investigator for ALPA, was more blunt. He told the AP "We don't know who fired the missile. But we have a lot more confidence that it was a missile."

However, former NTSB Director of Aviation Safety Tom Haueter said that the board's conclusion that it was an internal explosion is based on "irrefutable" evidence. He said there was no indication of any outside penetration of the airplane.

(Image provided by the NTSB)

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 10.24.14: AML's Innovations, NASA Preps For Mars, LightHawk Saves

Also: AW609 Pilots Honored, Airbus' VIP Cabin, FreeFlight's FTX-200, Quicksilver S-LSA Milestone During our visit this week to NBAA 2014, Jim Campbell had a chance to talk with Mar>[...]

Airborne at NBAA-10.22.14: Legacy 500, Universal InSight, BendixKing AeroWave

Also: GE Honda, Sagem's Active SideStick, Syberjet Update, Techno Aerospace Knows How to Party The FAA handed over certification papers for Embraer's Legacy 500 executive jet durin>[...]

Airborne 10.24.14: AML's Innovations, NASA Preps For Mars, LightHawk Saves

Also: AW609 Pilots Honored, Airbus' VIP Cabin, FreeFlight's FTX-200, Quicksilver S-LSA Milestone During our visit this week to NBAA 2014, Jim Campbell had a chance to talk with Mar>[...]

AD: Pacific Aerospace Limited Airplanes

AD NUMBER: 2014-21-02 PRODUCT: Pacific Aerospace Limited Model FU24-954 and FU24A-954 airplanes.>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (10.25.14)

The Canard Zone An online forum by and for owners and builders of canard aircraft.>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2014 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC