FAA Hit With Class Action Lawsuit Over Drone Registration | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne Unlimited-
Monday

Airborne-Unmanned w/AUVSI-
Tuesday

Airborne Unlimited-
Wednesday

AMA Drone Report-
Thursday

Airborne Unlimited-
Friday

Airborne On ANN

Airborne Unlimited-12-10-18

Airborne Unmanned-12-11-18

Airborne Unlimited-12.05.18

AMA Drone Report-12.06.18

Airborne Unlimited-12.07.18

Airborne-YouTube

Airborne Unlimited-12-10-18

Airborne Unmanned-12-11-18

Airborne Unlimited-12.05.18

AMA Drone Report-12.06.18

Airborne Unlimited-12.07.18

Thu, Jan 18, 2018

FAA Hit With Class Action Lawsuit Over Drone Registration

Alleges That The FAA Violated Several Laws With Drone Registration Database

The FAA has been hit with another lawsuit over its drone registration database, and this time the agency is facing nearly $840 million in penalties, should the plaintiffs be successful.

Drone attorney Jonathan Rupprecht writes on his blog that the case has been brought by Robert Taylor. He's the brother of John Taylor, the attorney who won a case against the FAA that temporarily suspended the FAA's drone registration requirement. Rupprecht says that this case is a Class Action suit of at least 836,796 members against the FAA.

According to Rupprecht:

Count I is alleging that the FAA collected personal information and money under the Part 48 registration regulations which were declared illegal under the Taylor v. Huerta case. Even after the Taylor v. Huerta ruling, the FAA continued to collect and retain all of the personal information and money. They did not delete the registry or refund the money. “The Privacy Act mandates that agencies that maintain a ‘system of records’ must ‘maintain in its records only such information about an individual as is relevant and necessary to accomplish a purpose of the agency required to be accomplished by statute or by executive order of the President.'” 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(1).” The FAA maintained the personal information of the individuals when the FAA lacked statutory authority, made clear by the Taylor v. Huerta case, and thus violated the Privacy Act. Because the FAA acted intentionally or willfully, each injured party is entitled to $1,000 in statutory damages.

Count II of the lawsuit alleges that under the Little Tucker Act, the Federal Government’s sovereign immunity is waived when the government takes money from individuals in violation of a statute. This is the same thing being alleged in another class action against the FAA, Reichert v. FAA, regarding the FAA illegally taking the $5 during registration. They want everyone’s $5 back.

Count III alleges that the FAA “violated Plaintiff and the Class’s Constitutional and privacy rights by unlawfully promulgating the Registration Rule and enforcing the Registration Rule without any statutory authority to do so. Further, once the D.C. Circuit vacated the Registration Rule, the Defendants did not delete the private and personal information of Model Aircraft owners and did not refund their registration fees. In addition, the Defendants unlawfully continued the registration process and unlawfully maintained Plaintiff and the Class’s private and personal information even after the D.C. Circuit held that the Defendants were prohibited from doing so.” Basically, the constitutional right was the right to judicial review in Article III of the Constitution and the FAA just ignored the D.C. Circuit’s ruling.

Count IV alleges unjust enrichment by collecting over 4 million in fees.

The lawsuit is seeking $5 back for the class ($4,183,980), Privacy Act violation statutory damages of $1,000 EACH for the members of the class, or an estimated $836,796,000. The total would be nearly $841 million,  plus attorneys fees.

In December, Congress passed and President Trump signed the National Defense Authorization Act, which overturned the initial Taylor v. Huerta ruling and put the drone registration regulations back in place.

(Image from file)

FMI: Original report

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 12.10.18: 'Pecos Bill' Accident, Astronaut Nick Hague, SpaceX Update

Also: Champion Aerospace Recall, EAA’s Post-Secondary Scholarships, Ryanair Pilot Training, Universal Avionics The NTSB has released its preliminary report from the accident >[...]

Airborne 12.07.18: Continental Power-Liaoning Cub, AirVenture, Lion Air v Boeing

Also: 64 Satellite 'Rideshare', Hurricane Hunters Finish Year, Cessna 208B SAIB, Aero-TV: Wright B Flyer Program Continental Motors Group has entered a strategic partnership with L>[...]

AMA Drone Report 12.06.18: No Drone Zone Nonsense, FAA's 'Buzzy', Airport Probs

Also: FAA Exec Appointment, Drone Use Standards, Censys BVLOS, Woolsey Fire Recovery Drones OK... it’s getting a little out of control... Signs have been popping up saying dr>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.10.18): Oceanic Airspace

Oceanic Airspace Airspace over the oceans of the world, considered international airspace, where oceanic separation and procedures per the International Civil Aviation Organization>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.10.18)

Aero Linx: Vintage Ultralight Association What began as the Vintage Ultralight Registry has become the "Vintage Ultralight Association". After much research I can tell you that the>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2018 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC