Disney Seeks Section 333 Exemption From The FAA | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Jan 20, 2016

Disney Seeks Section 333 Exemption From The FAA

Wants To Use 'Flixels' In Theme Parks For 'Entertainment Purposes'

Anyone who has flown in central Florida, particularly using any kind of glass panel, knows there is a permanent TFR in place over Walt Disney World just outside Orlando. But now the entertainment giant hopes to be able to fly UAVs within that TFR, and one over its California property, for its own purposes.

The company on October 30 filed for a Section 333 exemption to fly what it calls "Flixels" ... aircraft that are "based on traditional UAS [unmanned aircraft systems] platforms and include advanced control and positioning technology, onboard sensors (gyroscopes, accelerometers, GPS, barometers, magnetometers), and advanced wireless communication solutions."

The Orlando Sentinel reports that the company said in its application that it would not fly the aircraft over guest areas and not above 150 feet agl. The flights would take place mostly over water features in the park and in restricted areas. They would be used for park entertainment productions, including fireworks.

Disney even mentions the TFRs in its application. It said that the aircraft would "not interrupt national airspace activity because the Walt Disney World and Disneyland Resorts airspaces are registered no-fly zones."

Disney even blows its own horn a bit in the application. As a way to bolster its case, the company said that "in December 2012, Disney made several flights of an Imagineers-designed "fire breathing dragon," which was actually an elaborate glider and parachute obscured by the night sky, over The Magic Kingdom at Walt Disney World to celebrate the grand opening of Fantasyland."

Disney usually gets what it wants ... so it would not be a surprise to read that the exemption has been granted.

FMI: www.faa.gov/uas/legislative_programs/section_333

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 04.16.24: RV Update, Affordable Flying Expo, Diamond Lil

Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC