Does The JSF Have A Weight Problem? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

** AIRBORNE 05.24.13 Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 05.24.13 **

** AIRBORNE 05.21.13 Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 05.21.13 **

** AIRBORNE 04.01.13 SPECIAL EDITION of Aero-TV-- CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version -- AIRBORNE 04.01.13 SPECIAL EDITION **

Mon, May 17, 2004

Does The JSF Have A Weight Problem?

British Newspaper Says It's Too Heavy For UK Carriers

Like many Americans, the Joint Strike Fighter has a weight problem. So says the London Sunday Telegraph, which reports the new VTOL stealth warplane is 3,300 pounds too heavy to land on two new British aircraft carriers.

In British naval aviation, the JSF is slated to replace the venerable Harrier Jump Jet. But the Ministry of Defense in London says it's "concerned" that the JSF's weight problem will mean the aircraft won't be able to land vertically, causing huge headaches in the construction of those two new carriers.

The Telegraph cites a Lockheed-Martin analysis that it says points to weight problems in the JSF's engine. Although it's a revolutionary design, the engine itself weighs much more than had been planned for. The paper reports, if the VTOL version of the JSF has to be scrapped because of this problem, the carriers designed for it will have to be converted to a more conventional type. That conversion process could cost billions of dollars.

"Combat jets are like Formula One racing cars -- every part has a vital function -- you just can't get rid of it and still expect it work," said one unnamed MoD worker in an interview with the Telegraph. "I don't know how the weight is going to be reduced by 3,300 pounds. Until recently, the Americans were claiming it was only 1,000 pounds overweight, and they have spent a year and a half reducing that without success."

Rob Hewson, editor of Jane's Air Launched Weapons, said the JSF's weight problem could indeed be overwhelming. "This is going to cost at least 60 million pounds (sterling) to correct - if it can be corrected."

FMI: www.lockheedmartin.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.25.13)

Three-Eight Charlie If you know the name of the first woman to fly solo around the world, you’re ahead of most people. By the way, if you thought it was Amelia Earhart, you&r>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.25.13): Holding Pattern

Holding pattern. A racetrack pattern, involving two turns and two legs, used to keep an aircraft within a prescribed airspace with respect to a geographic fix.>[...]

Aero-News: Quote Of The Day (05.25.13)

“We need a world-class system of weather prediction in the United States – one, as the National Academy of Sciences recently put it, that is ‘second to none'." So>[...]

ANN FAQ: Share Aero-News With Your Friends

Send Them A Story -- We Don't Mind! Do you need another set of eyes to see that story you can't believe Jim just wrote? Want to spread Hognose's unique wisdom and perspective to th>[...]

Flight Attendant Union Endorses Ed Markey For U.S. Senate

Cites 'Strong Record On Aviation Security' The Association of Flight Attendants-CWA (AFA) has endorsed Congressman Ed Markey for the U.S. Senate, specifically noting his proven rec>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2013 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC