US Airways, MSP Want Jury Trial For Imams Lawsuit | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

AMA Drone Report

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday

Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne-Unmanned w/AUVSI

Airborne On ANN

AMA 05.18.17

Airborne
05.22.17

Airborne
05.23.17

Airborne
05.17.17

Airborne
05.18.17

Airborne
05.19.17

Airborne-Unmanned 05.23.17

Airborne-YouTube

AMA 05.18.17

Airborne
05.22.17

Airborne
05.23.17

Airborne
05.17.17

Airborne
05.18.17

Airborne
05.19.17

Airborne-Unmanned 05.23.17

XPONENTIAL Innovation Preview -- www.allthingsunmanned.com

Sat, Jan 05, 2008

US Airways, MSP Want Jury Trial For Imams Lawsuit

Say Passengers Who Spoke Up Are Protected From Litigation

Asserting the travelers, flight crew members, and law enforcement officers who removed six Muslim imams from a November 2006 flight were acting in the best interests of national security, officials with US Airways and Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport want a jury trial in the civil rights lawsuit brought forth by the imams.

As ANN reported, the six Muslim imams, or scholars, were removed from a US Airways flight to Phoenix after passengers and crewmembers expressed concern over what they called the men's suspicious behavior -- which allegedly included asking for seatbelt extensions, although the men didn't need them, and failure to take their assigned seats.

The six men, who were returning home from an Islamic clerics conference, also criticized the war in Iraq and President Bush, and spoke about al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden while in the terminal and onboard the plane, according to passenger complaints.

The Washington Times reports the airline and the Minneapolis Airports Commission also want immunity for those who stood up, and demanded the imams be removed from the flight -- citing a "John Doe" law passed by Congress last year, that protects those who report persons acting suspiciously to authorities.

A subsequent discrimination lawsuit, filed last year by the six men, was amended December 14 to include the six airport police officers who responded to the gate as defendants.

"We believe the police officers acted appropriately and that it is important that airports across the nation be able to take action when there is a reasonable belief that travelers could be threatened," said Minneapolis Airports Commission spokesman Patrick Hogan. "In this case, there were travelers and flight crew members who raised concerns, and we worked with federal authorities who interviewed the imams.

"We believe the process worked as it should to protect the traveling public," Hogan added.

In its response to the amended suit, US Airways rebutted the over 200 complaints brought forth by the Muslims against the airline, and denied "that it engaged in any unlawful discrimination or violated any federal or state law."

The carrier also demanded the imams produce "strict proof" on 97 of those claims before a jury -- and stood behind the captain on the flight, John Wood, who asked for the imams to be removed from his plane. US Airways said Wood, who acted on information provided by the cabin crew, suspected the imams "may have posed a risk to the security of the flight," and the "decision to deny transportation was based upon the legitimate, non-discriminatory business purpose of ensuring flight safety," the airline said.

The imams assert they were placed under arrest -- which they "did not consent to" -- saying the police officers' "acts and conducts were solely motivated by their intent to discriminate against [the imams] based on their race, color, religion, ethnicity."

US District Judge Ann Montgomery has not ruled whether she will hear the case with a jury present. She denied motions to dismiss the suit in November.

FMI: www.usairways.com, www.mnd.uscourts.gov/Judges/montgomery.htm

Advertisement

More News

AMA Drone Report 05.18.17: Drone-Jumping!, AMA Sightings Report, King Schools

Also: DJI Smart TV App, Huerta: Unmanned Aircraft 'Good News Story', XPONENTIAL Innovation Preview Ya had to see it to believe it... An ingenious Latvian UAS operation has pulled o>[...]

Airborne-Unmanned 05.23.17: Courts Nix Model Regs, Autonymous Flt, WATT 300

Also: King Schools Update, Kittyhawk APP, Robird And Integrated Drone Solutions, ICAO Drone Tracking The unmanned community got a bit of a jolt late last week when the US Court of >[...]

Airborne 05.23.17: Icon A5 NTSB Report, Product Certification, GE9X Testing

Also: UAL Cockpit Doors, NAHI 2017, Drone Database, Manual Flying Skills, Heli-Theft, Runway Extension, New SecAF The NTSB has released its preliminary report from an accident invo>[...]

Airborne-Unmanned 05.23.17: Courts Nix Model Regs, Autonymous Flt, WATT 300

Also: King Schools Update, Kittyhawk APP, Robird And Integrated Drone Solutions, ICAO Drone Tracking The unmanned community got a bit of a jolt late last week when the US Court of >[...]

Airborne-Unmanned 05.16.17: XPONENTIAL 2017, Airbus Aerial, Parrot Professional

Also: AUVSI BOD, PrecisionHawk's Free PrecisionMapper, Consortiq, XPONENTIAL 2017 Innovation Preview As opening sessions go, it was an eye-opener. Intel CEO Brian Krzanich took the>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2017 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC